Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who has Clemson beat?

 

Texas plays in the SEC. That's respect in itself.

2 more teams presently ranked in the top 25 than Texas has.  

yes yes, they play in the SEC.  A tale old as time.    

you didn’t address my point in either post.  Reality is the top of the SEC is weaker now than it has been.  What we see with the SEC is the bottom and middle improving.  This current Texas and UGA team wouldn’t belong in most of the final 4s from prior years.  They would be the 4th team smashed that didn’t belong.  

so yeah, Texas would have to win 4 straight.  That gives them the worst odds given everyone is meh out of the “favorites”.   I’ll take Oregon.   The former PAC12 team.   And even they aren’t good by old standards.  Trash Cade Klubnik got better production than their Heisman candidate. 

* please note at no time have I called Clemson good.  They are a shell of older Clemson teams.  They haven’t played 1 compete game all season.   The point is there are no powerhouse teams right now in college football.  These are not the SEC teams of old at the top.  They are clearly weaker.  What we saw was them get weaker and the SC, Vandys, etc get better 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

What’s really funny is saying Vandy would win the ACC, take it from someone that knows, sometimes it’s best just not to post anything when drunk / high

Sir I'm high off the gym. These are good clean energy thoughts. I don't abuse drugs. If I'm high off anything it's the whey protein from my smoothie.

 

Hit the gym bro get you some clean energy thoughts like me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

2 more teams presently ranked in the top 25 than Texas has.  

yes yes, they play in the SEC.  A tale old as time.    

you didn’t address my point in either post.  Reality is the top of the SEC is weaker now than it has been.  What we see with the SEC is the bottom and middle improving.  This current Texas and UGA team wouldn’t belong in most of the final 4s from prior years.  They would be the 4th team smashed that didn’t belong.  

so yeah, Texas would have to win 4 straight.  That gives them the worst odds given everyone is meh out of the “favorites”.   I’ll take Oregon.   The former PAC12 team.   And even they aren’t good by old standards.  Trash Cade Klubnik got better production than their Heisman candidate. 

* please note at no time have I called Clemson good.  They are a shell of older Clemson teams.  They haven’t played 1 compete game all season.   The point is there are no powerhouse teams right now in college football.  These are not the SEC teams of old at the top.  They are clearly weaker.  What we saw was them get weaker and the SC, Vandys, etc get better 

 

 

If Clemson is no good then we have no issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Vandy beat Alabama. The point is any team in the SEC can with any team on any Saturday. That conference is deep and loaded. 

 

Vandy would probably win the ACC if we being honest.

They couldn’t even run through the Sun Belt conference undefeated based on this season.  They lost to Georgia State.   Folks have been playing this nonsensical SEC trinkle down overhype game for a long time.  

Bama wouldn’t have gone through the ACC undefeated this year if they caught the wrong schedule.  Why? Because the top of the SEC doesn’t have great teams this year vs years past.  They just got talented rosters.  

Miami, Clemson, SMU, Syracuse, Louisville, GT, Duke.  I don’t think any SEC team THIS year could run through those 7 and not catch an L.   Old top SEC teams could
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If Clemson is no good then we have no issues.

Good is relative.  They aren’t good by the standard of what a good Clemson team is.   Better than the last 3 years if healthy but still not good. 

which also is true about present day Bama, OSU, etc.  Which remains my point.  The top of college football is weaker vs the past.  It’s weak this year.  Any of these teams can catch an L from a host of teams to a degree that wasn’t there not long ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sir I'm high off the gym. These are good clean energy thoughts. I don't abuse drugs. If I'm high off anything it's the whey protein from my smoothie.

 

Hit the gym bro get you some clean energy thoughts like me.

This might be the best argument to do drugs in the history of the world. LOL

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

I have no clue how we can start 3 guards and be this bad at shooting the 3 ball. Jackson HAS to be a starter to give us a little more size if these guards can’t shoot from deep and his offense is just as good. Living in Birmingham it hurts my soul that we lost to both Auburn and Alabama.  Thank God most here don’t care about NFL football or being a Carolina sport fan would be even harder.

No offensive system to create open shots and no inside presence to suck the D in. End result is guards taking a lot of bad shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

Lastest Ive heard about UNC and bill, they are still flirting. Bill is not the HC. 

I think he's demanding his terms and thus far UNC has agreed. 

Just crazy to believe this.

He's keeps upping the terms and demands. 

I feel its 50/50, still a huge part of me is like "hell no, this would never happen".....but its too far given they have met more than 5 times now. 

UNC next step is public pressure. 

My bingo card hass too many "1 out of 10 billion" odds filled this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Lastest Ive heard about UNC and bill, they are still flirting. Bill is not the HC. 

I think he's demanding his terms and thus far UNC has agreed. 

Just crazy to believe this.

He's keeps upping the terms and demands. 

I feel its 50/50, still a huge part of me is like "hell no, this would never happen".....but its too far given they have met more than 5 times now. 

UNC next step is public pressure. 

My bingo card hass too many "1 out of 10 billion" odds filled this year. 

If he is moving the ask like that fug him.  He is playing games

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If he is moving the ask like that fug him.  He is playing games

Others know but the portal is already open and players have entered. I believe UNC even lost a player or two already. UNC wants his confirmation, Bill keeps adding terms.....AND UNC keeps saying "Ok". 

Still regardless about what others have said, Hes not the HC currently.

It's like Bill didn't believe they would agree to his first mountain of demands and now its like he keeps adding more hoping they quit giving the "OK".  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

UNC is really painted into a corner now and old Bill probably knows it. Here the whole sports world is expecting Belichick to UNC to be announced imminently. Imagine not hiring him now? Whatever poor bastard you hire instead better make Nick Saban look like Matt Rhule in comparison. Oh, you know who wouldn't have lost that game? The greatest coach of all-time who wanted this fuging job. Lord, it would be brutal. Might as well just name Kitchens the permanent replacement and fire him after two or three poo seasons and just try the whole process over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OneBadCat
      This has to be bitached about, those biased refs

      By OneBadCat · Posted

      It really is insane how they always try to rig the game vs Dallas. Two exceptions being our playoff games.    Had we lost it definitely would have been right up there with the 2014 Playoffs vs 49ers, Dallas 05, Saints 2018 Playoffs, and SB50 as all time rigged games. 
    • AU-panther
      Week 6 PFF grades vs. DAL

      By AU-panther · Posted

      Say you don't understand PFF without saying you don't understand PFF... Every week seems like some of the same people are complaining about something they clearly don't understand.  I'm not saying they are the end all resource out there but once you understand their methodology you can start to appreciate some of their work. For example, their grading system isn't a high school grading system, try to look at some of it in relative terms.  Rico had an 82 rushing grade, that's pretty good.  I would be curious to know how that compares to every other running back this past weekend. Also, I think he had a few penalties, which if I'm not mistaken are graded pretty harshly.      
    • strato
      Passing Stats

      By strato · Posted

      Can we go back to square one for a minute and remember what we paid for this guy and how he was sold?  He was like, the anti excuse. Makes everybody better, Did we get that?  I think the answer is still coming but so far you might can say that for a game or two.  Cam had issues with personnel every season almost. Horrible OL, but he had receivers. Decent to good OL no receivers. Etc. Bryce needs to stand up, or keep standing up, however you want to put it. It is big boy time in year 3. He doesn’t have to make the playoffs but there is a standard. We’ll see what happens.  But the excuses are just fuging tired.  ps, I mean let’s not crown him when he has franchise record production in two wins,.. let’s see when they stop that, how he does then. 
×
×
  • Create New...