Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How to Watch the Games


KBRed
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, therealmjl said:

I usually just turn Hulu Live back on during the season. 
 

I tried antenna for preseason but you forget how frequently you need/want to pause and rewind games and with just an antenna you can’t do that. 

My damn digital antenna buffers like a mother fuger.  That technology didn't need messed with

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Adb6368 said:

If nfl+ is mobile only and gets you the game you need I regularly use AirPlay and stream my iPad through my tv with no problem. Could obviously use your phone but using the tablet keeps my phone freed up during the game so it doesn’t restrict by ability to complain on this site real time…

I’ve tried to mirror with the phone and it’s blocked. So, you are saying you can use the NFL app through the iPad and mirror?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KBRed said:

I’ve tried to mirror with the phone and it’s blocked. So, you are saying you can use the NFL app through the iPad and mirror?

Per the NFL, mirroring isn't supported.  I'm guessing that the previous commenter was saying they AirCast *other* content from their device, and not specifically NFL+

https://support.nfl.com/hc/en-us/articles/5405818220060-Can-I-cast-live-games-from-NFL-or-NFL-Premium-to-my-television

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, KBRed said:

I’ve tried to mirror with the phone and it’s blocked. So, you are saying you can use the NFL app through the iPad and mirror?

Unfortunately didn’t know nfl was that uptight to block airplay… I guess my idea doesn’t work in this case. That seems ridiculous to me. But hey we are talking about the league that charges an arm and a leg to pay for Sunday ticket where the average buyer doesn’t care about 95% of the games they are playing for 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Adb6368 said:

Unfortunately didn’t know nfl was that uptight to block airplay… I guess my idea doesn’t work in this case. That seems ridiculous to me. But hey we are talking about the league that charges an arm and a leg to pay for Sunday ticket where the average buyer doesn’t care about 95% of the games they are paying for 

Roger Goddell in a recent interview:

Goodell claimed the NFL’s broadcast policies are “as fan-friendly as you can get” while reiterating the universal availability of live, in-market games for fans 

 

Quote

“Every game in those home markets, it is shown on free television,” Goodell said. “Eighty to 90 percent of our games are shown on free television, and that’s far and away more than any league worldwide



Sunday Ticket is not for a local fan wanting to watch their local team. It's for the uber-sports fan (or sports bars, which is a different story) or an out-of-market fan who can't/won't go to a sports bar

https://awfulannouncing.com/nfl/roger-goodell-broadcast-policies-fan-friendly.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KBRed said:

Does anyone know if you can watch the game via the Fox app without a TV subscription?

Unsure. If you're in market and don't have a cable package, you might want to break out an antenna just in case it doesn't

I have been able to watch CBS games remotely with a paramount+ subscription (don't recall if it was a local broadcast game or not, but P+ does do geoblocking)

Edited by PanthersATL
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Unsure. If you're in market and don't have a cable package, you might want to break out an antenna just in case it doesn't

I have been able to watch CBS games remotely with a paramount+ subscription (don't recall if it was a local broadcast game or not, but P+ does do geoblocking)

Confirmed: yes, but cable login required

 

https://help.fox.com/s/article/Can-I-watch-NFL-games-on-FOX

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...