Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce dropback and footwork


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MRenshaw said:

He was never considered an elite pocket passer. Never. I don't know where or how you got that ridiculous idea from. Bryce was touted as a football supercomputer and an exciting out-of-pocket improviser who possessed superior arm elasticity and excelled at making off-the-platform throws. 

Oh man I forgot about the talk of his arm "elasticity" hahaha. That was a key point to shout down any talk of perceived lack of arm strength compared to Stroud AR or Levis. Shows how truly desperate the talking heads were who were only worried about saying nice things about Alabama.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frankw said:

Oh man I forgot about the talk of his arm "elasticity" hahaha. That was a key point to shout down any talk of perceived lack of arm strength compared to Stroud AR or Levis. Shows how truly desperate the talking heads were who were only worried about saying nice things about Alabama.

Yep, plenty of smoke being blown up Alabama's ass. The tongue bathing from the pundits was embarrassing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joe Bear said:

You're delusional if you think a coach in his first game is going to say "well Bryce sucks, he cost us the game himself, he's 5-foot-2 and he throws like a girl." That's never going to happen. There's a level of respect in the NFL coaching ranks, and really at any level in sports, where coaches aren't going to give fans the pound of flesh they demand after one horrible game. It's unrealistic.

And to be fair, outside of saying his footwork was good, Canales was pretty critical of Bryce.  Talked about the throws he kept missing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At Alabama most of what he did was run around and Chuck it up to receivers who where better than the opposing defenders by a good amount. He may have been calm and made big dramatic plays under pressure but he always made it look dramatic and not doing the things to make suble moves in the pocket like the good qbs. Now all he does is bail when there is no need.

He makes his OL look worse because he just wants to run around 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, csx said:

At Alabama most of what he did was run around and Chuck it up to receivers who where better than the opposing defenders by a good amount. He may have been calm and made big dramatic plays under pressure but he always made it look dramatic and not doing the things to make suble moves in the pocket like the good qbs. Now all he does is bail when there is no need.

He makes his OL look worse because he just wants to run around 

Basically a shorter Johnny Manziel without the arm talent but who takes the effort to memorize the playbook. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mage said:

And to be fair, outside of saying his footwork was good, Canales was pretty critical of Bryce.  Talked about the throws he kept missing.  

Yeah I mean, he handled it the way a coach should handle it, not the way angry message-board fans want it handled. No one here is involved in the inner workings of this team and any guesses as to what's said behind closed doors are just that: guesses attempted to be passed off as fact, i.e. confirmation bias. People don't need to a coach's press conference to be told the QB and the defense are historically bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...