Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Marshal


Fan4life

Recommended Posts

If the Panthers are looking a number two reciever behind Steve Smith. Why are they not going after Brandon Marshal ? They have been looking a number 2 for about what 5 years now. WTF. This Franchise just will not pay the big money. " we will see how long Stewart and Williams stays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hopefully Marshall doesn't get a 1st round offer this year and we get him with next years.. or a 2nd and add another..

Marshall will require a big contract. #1 receivers will do that. Since we are in need of a #1 receiver, I don't follow the logic on how we will get around this besides paying for mediocre talent and great character...

plus, he's killed a few people...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottem line is that it takes quite a while to develop a great reciever, even Steve Smith. There is a top 5 reciever available in Marshall and he is worth a 1st round pick. At least a 2nd and 3rd. Why waist 2 years developing a receiver that may or may not prodice(In Carolina's case never produces) when you can have one right now?

End of Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

broncos have said that they don't want anything less than a top 20 pick in this years draft. not sure we can even trade up to that without giving up quite a few picks.

for more discussion....just find one of the other threads on this dead horse topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont get me wrong, I'd love to have Marshall play for the Panthers. BUT, character issues, money(which paying him huge money right before the possible lockout would and will be a very dumb idea), and as a rookie develops this season, we can sign a FA WR next year AND Jarrett is a FA. there are many good young recievers that are already developed enough to be a #2/#1 WR in the future in FA next year...like James Jones who in my opinion is going to be a great WR.

http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/features/freeagents/fa.php?option=WR&y=2011

EDIT: another thing, Sidney Rice is a FA next year. I believe he will sign a long term contract with the Vikings, which would put Bernard Berrian on the trade block. Berrian could possibly be had for a 4th round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really!!!

I still think Marshall will be a Seahawk. The Holmes deal to the Jets will help that along as well. Denver will fold between tonight and next Thursday and there's no way they get a first for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...