Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 12 Other NFL Games


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Well, it would depend on why he did it.  For example, if Daniel Jones publicly called him out, called him a horrible coach, then maybe.  But if he did it just for spite, then Daboll should never be a head coach ever again.  

Benching him is one thing but Daboll made him 4th string on the depth chart and was evidently gonna make him run the scout team in practice. I mean... damn. LOL. Jones was like... yeah, just go ahead and cut me now bro 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Man you're on here defending a crappy QB who robbed a franchise for millions and decided not to live up to his contract.

 

Just stop the nonsense. He's an adult he will be fine. Who cares if it's petty and childish. This wouldn't even be a conversation if he just played like a franchise QB.

Once again, you have zero idea what you even read and definitely didn't comprehend.

donald trump alex acosta GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Benching him is one thing but Daboll made him 4th string on the depth chart and was evidently gonna make him run the scout team in practice. I mean... damn. LOL

Daniels got paid and decided to play like crap. He's likely gonna cost Daboll his job. I have no problem with him embarrassing Daniels.

 

The guy literally quit on the team after getting paid. That is the real joke nobody is talking about. Who the hell is this guy to ask for a release after playing like poo after that big contract smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Daniels got paid and decided to play like crap. He's likely gonna cost Daboll his job. I have no problem with him embarrassing Daniels.

 

The guy literally quit on the team after getting paid. That is the real joke nobody is talking about. Who the hell is this guy to ask for a release after playing like poo after that big contract smh

He didn't decide poo. He just sucks. He sucked before they paid him. They made a dumbass decision then Daboll doubled down on it being an ass to a guy who was evidently pretty popular in the locker room.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That is still not the way to handle it. It's childish and petty. The other players are going to see you being childish, petty and intentionally embarrassing another veteran player. 

Unsurprisingly, the team basically laid down today. He lost the team with that move. It's a business, it's not personal. He made it personal.

Just saying it would be understandable.  Dabol is definitely getting canned though at the end of the season assuming he last that long. 

Its amazing how fast things can change.  We are no longer at the bottom of the NFL pile now.  Giants, Jags, Raiders, or Titans occupy the bottom spots.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He didn't decide poo. He just sucks. He sucked before they paid him. They made a dumbass decision then Daboll doubled down on it being an ass to a guy who was evidently pretty popular in the locker room.

I agree now that I think about it. I remember thinking why the hell did the Giants overpay for that bum. 

Daboll the bully. I get it now. Carry on with this conversation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Just saying it would be understandable.  Dabol is definitely getting canned though at the end of the season assuming he last that long. 

Its amazing how fast things can change.  We are solidly no longer at the bottom of the NFL pile now.  Giants, Jags, Raiders, or Titans occupy the bottom spots.  

It wouldn't be understandable. These aren't HS kids, these are professional football players. It is the same reason a guy like Josh McDaniels fails everywhere. You can't be an asshole to your players, they will stop playing for you. 

The race for the bottom has been tight all season. There are about 8-10 teams pretty close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...