Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Tankathon Approach to the remaining Schedule


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

There is another WR who seems to be under the radar--Bech, from TCU I think.  Like Legette, had a strong SR year without doing too much before that, but his hands are great--will see how he runs.  Beck reminds me of AT, from what little I have seen

I also like that kid Kingston I think is his name from BYU. There's some hidden gems in this draft at wr if you look hard enough. You just have to look past the 2 that is constantly being hyped.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Wilson or Higgins are a great solution but we have no idea if they want anything to do with us. Frankly, it may have to involve a top 5 at position salary(if not #1 overall) to make it even a possibility.

Wilson has no say, he is only on his third year next year and can't negate a trade. So bring him, if he kills it make him rich and smile.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

I also like that kid Kingston I think is his name from BYU. There's some hidden gems in this draft at wr if you look hard enough. You just have to look past the 2 that is constantly being hyped.

This draft is very light on elite talent but there are a lot of positions that have substantial depth. WR, EDGE, etc. 

There is no excuse to not end up with 2 new starters with our first two picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Wilson has no say, he is only on his third year next year and can't negate a trade. So bring him, if he kills it make him rich and smile.

Sure but why would you want to bring in a guy that literally doesn't want to be here? That isn't likely to work out the way we hope.

I still doubt they move him, TBH. I suspect they are far more likely to move on from Rodgers than move Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I also like that kid Kingston I think is his name from BYU. There's some hidden gems in this draft at wr if you look hard enough. You just have to look past the 2 that is constantly being hyped.

There have been gems found late at WR every year.  Everyone is saying that we need a #1, and I get it.  However, Coker and XL are rookies and they will improve--how much?  Who knows.  Theilen has been great, but of course, he is showing signs of aging-drives with his turn signal on and goes to Golden Corral at 4:30 for dinner.  Last year was the year to grab a #1--I am not even sure the best WR in this draft will be a #1.  Kids can be successful in college with suspect hands and bad route running--if they can run they get overevaluated, in my view.  I think a kid who runs crisp routes, is fundamentally sound, has great hands, etc. would give us what we need--especially if we get a top TE--which may be the way to go in a down WR market and draft.  Sanders is showing signs--and he would still be effective as the #2 WR.  Tremble as the #3.  The kid from Penn State could be the sleeper pick in round 2.  Mark my wirds!!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

This draft is very light on elite talent but there are a lot of positions that have substantial depth. WR, EDGE, etc. 

There is no excuse to not end up with 2 new starters with our first two picks.

I think that elite term is overplayed. None of these guys are elite at the nfl level and a majority will never be. What we want are gamers, not paper warriors. All too often players are valued by measurements and not proven ability. Find those guys that will be better than the 2 everyone is fawning over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Sure but why would you want to bring in a guy that literally doesn't want to be here? That isn't likely to work out the way we hope.

I still doubt they move him, TBH. I suspect they are far more likely to move on from Rodgers than move Wilson.

I mean, lots of players play at places they don't want too. If the do really well, suddenly they always wanted to be there, if they dont, then they make it known.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Wilson has no say, he is only on his third year next year and can't negate a trade. So bring him, if he kills it make him rich and smile.

He is not in a good situation,and it is getting to him.  I think this would be a great acquisition.  What would I trade for him?  Imagine Wilson, AT, XL Coker and maybe a stud TE.

Here is an interesting question:  Would you trade Horn for him straight up?  They would love the Horn / Sauce CB tandem, we would not have to pay him a king's ransom, etc.  I would make the trade--injury history/salary, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I think that elite term is overplayed. None of these guys are elite at the nfl level and a majority will never be. What we want are gamers, not paper warriors. All too often players are valued by measurements and not proven ability. Find those guys that will be better than the 2 everyone is fawning over.

Well in this context we are talking about "talent."

The pool of players that have potential to be top 10 players at their position is fairly small in this draft. This is largely the general of view this class. 

That doesn't mean you can't get very good players or starters. It doesn't mean guys won't perform better than their "projections." That happens all the time.

But these general takes on a class or position tend to be correct more often than they aren't. 

Good recent example was that 2022 QB class which was largely viewed as one of the worst in recent memory. And, it's largely been that....minus Brock Purdy. But the entire rest of that class is 2nd or 3rd string QB's after amassing a LOT of games started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He is not in a good situation,and it is getting to him.  I think this would be a great acquisition.  What would I trade for him?  Imagine Wilson, AT, XL Coker and maybe a stud TE.

Here is an interesting question:  Would you trade Horn for him straight up?  They would love the Horn / Sauce CB tandem, we would not have to pay him a king's ransom, etc.  I would make the trade--injury history/salary, etc.

Yeah I would do that trade, and the take the top CB in the draft. If we get him with out using our top 10 pick, even better!

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I mean, lots of players play at places they don't want too. If the do really well, suddenly they always wanted to be there, if they dont, then they make it known.

I am not saying don't trade for him or at least consider it, but I also don't want to give up a king's ransom for a guy that bolts in a couple of years because he never wanted to be here in the first place.

And this is all speculative. We have no idea what his feelings about us are. I am just saying that in general I don't want guys that really, really don't want to be here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the draft has depth at WR, Edge, and I would add that I like the LB depth as well. 

I am not liking the depth at starting QB (I am not sure there is one) but I love the depth at developmental QBs, TE, OL, or #1 WRs--if that is a real thing (theory).  I do like the WR depth overall.  I think there are gems throughout the draft at WR, and it depends on the system, qb, and chemistry with the other WRs, but there are some great WRs out there drafted late or not at all. 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He is not in a good situation,and it is getting to him.  I think this would be a great acquisition.  What would I trade for him?  Imagine Wilson, AT, XL Coker and maybe a stud TE.

Here is an interesting question:  Would you trade Horn for him straight up?  They would love the Horn / Sauce CB tandem, we would not have to pay him a king's ransom, etc.  I would make the trade--injury history/salary, etc.

I mean, who in their right mind wouldn't make that trade?

Horn is a very good player but he is less likely to end up being elite at his position than Wilson is, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...