Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foxhole: Good news for D-line


JakeFlake

Recommended Posts

On injuries: Did not participate: Jeff Hangartner (ankle). Full participation: Maake Kemoeatu (ankle), Damione Lewis (shoulder) and Jeff Otah (toe).

On if it was good to have defensive tackles Maake Kemoeatu and Damione Lewis back: Yep. We had a little hiatus but we got them back; that was a good reason for the bye. So we should be at full strength.

On how much of a relief it is to get Kemoeatu and Lewis back: I think any time you have starters out it makes it more difficult. That’s why they’re starters. It’s, obviously, good to have them back.

http://www.panthers.com/Common/Article.aspx?id=43504

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"On if it is even more important having Kemoeatu and Lewis back considering how well Arizona ran the ball against Atlanta: It’s huge. Again, it’s hard for us to determine what plan of attack they’ll take, whether they are going to feature the run or feature the pass. But that’s the same dilemma you deal with every week no matter who the opponent is. As we tell our guys, it’s their ball, they can do whatever they want. But this better gets us ready to be able to play at our best."

106 yards from the 32nd ranked cardinals against the 28th ranked rush defense of the falcons, yeah the cardinals are a powerhouse, I'm so nervous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think his football IQ is well below average. I do not think he can read defenses at all. He is not the long term answer. I'm getting worried about DC. I think he has problems seeing the big picture for each game. Some people can't accept it, but this game is greatly affected by momentum. It's hard to explain but you can just feel his decisions break it at least two or three times a game (I think he is pretty solid when it comes to 4th down decisions). My biggest concern is this. You have seen these coaches time and time again. For some reason you have these coaches that absolutely will not go with what is working. We need a name for these coaches, what is it? If something is working great, they just do not have the intelligence to comprehend that something working is actually good for their team. They cannot understand this. AND REPORTERS NEED TO CALL THIS OUT. Rushing was insane for the past two games...ok let's take half his carries away and have Bryce air it out (look at the attempts he had). The reporters need to freaking ask "((this)) was working, you didn't do ((this)), do you consider that bad coaching? If so, why? If not, why do you defend doing the opposite of what it best?" Anyone knows you keep doing something until they stop it. But you have these coaches that think the are going to pull a fast one on them and do the thing that is not working. Dave is starting to remind me of that guy in the movie Kung Pow. I think his name was Weeblow or something, he had those squeaky shoes when he ran around. The Kung Fu masters trained him wrong as a joke, so he did things to get the crap beat out of him instead of winning the fight. I am going to start calling Dave Canales WEEBLOW if he keeps doing the opposite of what would win. But seriously, if he is going to be that type of coach, I would honestly get rid of him after this season. You 100% do not want a coach with this flaw...they may have one good fluke season but it will be years of terrible teams.
    • I mean the Bronco's only won by 1, but no one there is complaining.
    • A QB who can't consistently throw the ball 20 yards downfield has no business being a starting QB in this league. That is a backup QB who you put in there to manage a game when your starter goes down.
×
×
  • Create New...