Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So the Patriots are apparently looking for a #1 pick in 2011.


SmootsDaddy89

Recommended Posts

and 2nd and a 3rd is way too much unless they are both very late in the round.

We got a 2nd and a fourth in 2009, and even if the Patriots traded us 47, that's later than what San Fran traded us.

If THEY'RE looking for a 2011 pick, they obviously are putting more value on it than we anticipated there would be.

Both of their 2nd rounders wouldn't be out of question.

But again, that's IF the Patriots are actively pursuing another first in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots have three second rounders I thought...toss in two of those and maybe a fifth rounder and I'll take it. Even without the fifth, not a bad deal if its the two picks ahead of us they have.

Draft up a McCoy and a Tate/Benn in the second, focus on building depth with the rest of the draft. I could see it.

BUT....I just don't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh... no?

We've got plenty of compensatory picks this year. If we tank, we might need a high first rounder next year to help continue the rebuil... err... youth movement.

Hmm one mid/late rounder in a weak draft in 2011, or two 2nd round picks in a deep class in which most of these second rounders would be first rounders in most years.

GOLLY I'M SO CONFLICTED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots have three second rounders I thought...toss in two of those and maybe a fifth rounder and I'll take it. Even without the fifth, not a bad deal if its the two picks ahead of us they have.

Draft up a McCoy and a Tate/Benn in the second, focus on building depth with the rest of the draft. I could see it.

BUT....I just don't see it happening.

You are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm one mid/late rounder in a weak draft in 2011, or two 2nd round picks in a deep class in which most of these second rounders would be first rounders in most years.

GOLLY I'M SO CONFLICTED.

Plus were going to get a comp 3rd for Peppers next season. So we'll have 2 3rd's next draft.. I don't see the big deal in trading out of a weak 1st round and into a deep 2nd round filled to the brim with 1st round talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...