Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers 2010 Draft Grade


Pumpkin King

What say you?  

135 members have voted

  1. 1. What say you?

    • A
      34
    • B
      67
    • C
      26
    • D
      7
    • F
      1


Recommended Posts

B- to B, would have an A+ if not for trading a 2nd for a project.

Then it would have remained an A- if not for the spamming of corners in the final round, two if which likely won't make the team. And I still don't like that Pike pick, no matter who long I stew on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd say a solid B. didn't like the trade of next year's 2nd for an unproven project prospect. nor did i like the choice for our DL pick. however, they get mad points for snaggin' Clausen in the second (which i've grown to like this pick over night for some reason), and i was high on Brandon Lafell before we picked him, and i'm even more stoked now that he's on the team. i also really liked the LB pick, but the CBs are huge question marks... but i'm sold on 'em if they're mostly used for special teams should they make the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I would grade it a C, but I have to bump it down to a D simply due to trading a 2nd next year for Armanti Edwards. A 2nd for a 3rd is unacceptable, period.

I seriously hope he proves he's worth a 2nd this season though, even if he is a QB being converted to receiver and kick returner.

ugh..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alrite 3500 post warrior watch the lazy f*ck play and we'll talk .. you dont have to agree with your huddle buddies just because you wanna fit in .. this isnt high school polly prissy pants

I could care less about the other posters. Im just calling a spade a spade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey if you wanna be pissed at me .. have a good reason .. if you have 3600 posts in your 20s and id be willing to say the forums for this havent been around THAT long 2006 maybe.. you should actually play the sport before trying to talk me down .. Greg Hardy is injury pone , lazy and should go die on someone elses teams .. use that pick on a return man or maybe even what steve smith asked for .. idk .. a deep threat .. smitty can jog on all of these bs recievers and mr baylor shys away from contact .. i just call it like i see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey if you wanna be pissed at me .. have a good reason .. if you have 3600 posts in your 20s and id be willing to say the forums for this havent been around THAT long 2006 maybe.. you should actually play the sport before trying to talk me down .. Greg Hardy is injury pone , lazy and should go die on someone elses teams .. use that pick on a return man or maybe even what steve smith asked for .. idk .. a deep threat .. smitty can jog on all of these bs recievers and mr baylor shys away from contact .. i just call it like i see it

lol I dont even have to make an argument against you. You do it yourself. Thanks for doing all the work for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...