Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

James Pearce 4.47 forty time. Wow.


rebelrouser
 Share

Recommended Posts

They superimposed S. Barkley, James Pearche, AJ Brown, and J. Hurts running the forty and James is right behind Barkley, right in front of Brown and way in front of Hurts.  Not the best indicator for success on the dline but that is impressive. I can't find a dlineman that had a better time at the combine.

40 yd dash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's also already pretty good against the run.  Has some inconsistencies from time to time, but sheds off blocks and moves laterally very well to get to the runner.  Def a fan.  I see a Will McDonald with better burst.  Needs to pack on some meat, but he's a really strong prospect.  

Projected top-5 overall preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bear Hands said:

He's also already pretty good against the run.  Has some inconsistencies from time to time, but sheds off blocks and moves laterally very well to get to the runner.  Def a fan.  I see a Will McDonald with better burst.  Needs to pack on some meat, but he's a really strong prospect.  

Projected top-5 overall preseason.

He's gone under the radar for sure. He could have gone late 1st and ended up on a playoff team but now he's worked his way into top 10 consideration at least.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He's gone under the radar for sure. He could have gone late 1st and ended up on a playoff team but now he's worked his way into top 10 consideration at least.

A few people have had him top-15 overall for a minute like PFF and I think it holds true. His potential on top of a decent floor is sky high. And at a coveted position. Personally think he’s PR #2 after Carter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

A few people have had him top-15 overall for a minute like PFF and I think it holds true. His potential on top of a decent floor is sky high. And at a coveted position. Personally think he’s PR #2 after Carter.

I think he is myself. Just depends on how motivated he is to be the best. Right most these nfl guys mock him in the late 1st. It's hard for me to believe that considering the competition in this class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think he is myself. Just depends on how motivated he is to be the best. Right most these nfl guys mock him in the late 1st. It's hard for me to believe that considering the competition in this class. 

 

If I remember right, five months Peace was the early #1 on most boards. 

Then he had a ho-hu 2024 and dropped to the 20s.

It's just a bad year for 6-20-30 draft picks, it's basically the same tier.

He looked tall to me as well. 

Even before this combine, I had no issue with peace at 8

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

If I remember right, five months Peace was the early #1 on most boards. 

Then he had a ho-hu 2024 and dropped to the 20s.

It's just a bad year for 6-20-30 draft picks, it's basically the same tier.

He looked tall to me as well. 

Even before this combine, I had no issue with peace at 8

 

If it were me I would probably pick Graham if he's there and Pearce Jr. if he's not. I would either go Graham in the 1st and try like he'll to get Jihaad Campbell in the 2nd. Or take Pearce Jr. in the 1st and Deone Walker in the 2nd. That's my dream scenarios right now.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If it were me I would probably pick Graham if he's there and Pearce Jr. if he's not. I would either go Graham in the 1st and try like he'll to get Jihaad Campbell in the 2nd. Or take Pearce Jr. in the 1st and Deone Walker in the 2nd. That's my dream scenarios right now.

 

I personally think they need a pass catcher starter, we are at odds over this, but guess what I agree with your wants for the top two picks.

I believe 3 paths-

8- Tmac

57- BPA at DL, edge, LB, SS

OR

8- Best DLmen

57- best pass cather left arroy/golden/4 other TEs that fell

OR

8- BPA(should be defense)

57- BPA(should be defense)

 

 

In all of them form 3rd round til the 7th, load up that defense but use either 4th/5th on a RB, then back to defense. 

2 picks on Offense(starter level pass catcher and RB0

7 picks on DT, NT, Edge, LB, Safety, CB(if you listen to Dan, I feel Michael Jackson is priced out of coming back). 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

I personally think they need a pass catcher starter, we are at odds over this, but guess what I agree with your wants for the top two picks.

I believe 3 paths-

8- Tmac

57- BPA at DL, edge, LB, SS

OR

8- Best DLmen

57- best pass cather left arroy/golden/4 other TEs that fell

OR

8- BPA(should be defense)

57- BPA(should be defense)

 

 

In all of them form 3rd round til the 7th, load up that defense but use either 4th/5th on a RB, then back to defense. 

2 picks on Offense(starter level pass catcher and RB0

7 picks on DT, NT, Edge, LB, Safety, CB(if you listen to Dan, I feel Michael Jackson is priced out of coming back). 

 

See I'm just the opposite in that I think the first 3 picks should be defense because that's where the most talented players are. But go bpa the rest of the way because you can find offensive talent in round 4 thru 6. Take a kicker in the 7th if we still have it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

See I'm just the opposite in that I think the first 3 picks should be defense because that's where the most talented players are. But go bpa the rest of the way because you can find offensive talent in round 4 thru 6. Take a kicker in the 7th if we still have it.

 

You just gave me the main reason I want to use, ONE, just one pick of the first 2 picks on a pass catcher. Form experts predictions- starting DL could/should be found into the 4th round. Panthers need starter WR and TE, 0.2% that can be filled by mid round pick. Get AJ green(loL) aka Tmac at 8th, then use 2nd, 3rd, and both 4ths on Defense with a focus on DL/edge. 

they have three 5th rounders, use one on RB and the other two on defense depth. 

 us fans and the team will win in the long run!! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

He's also already pretty good against the run.  Has some inconsistencies from time to time, but sheds off blocks and moves laterally very well to get to the runner.  Def a fan.  I see a Will McDonald with better burst.  Needs to pack on some meat, but he's a really strong prospect.  

Projected top-5 overall preseason.

 I believe he was the main #1 overall back then.

I just rewatched one of the drills in which coach makes you go right left, then run back.....his ankle movement was insane.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...