Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's Matt Moore's ceiling?


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Jimmy Clausen was a gift..obviously unforeseen by the panthers. This gives us a nice conumdrum with the qb situation. One of them is going to shine and my money is on clausen. Not saying i wouldn't want moore to do well, but i feel as though clausen has the potential to be an elite qb..something the panthers have never had. Moore may become an above average qb, but i feel clausen for the sake of the thread has a higher "ceiling." someone may be traded by years end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone may be traded by years end.

i think it will take a couple of years. moore will be the above average QB we all expect him to be and then will refuse to stay when jimmy out paces him and takes the starting spot. pike and cantwell will compete for the 2 and 3 spots and will fill our depth chart for the next 4-6 seasons before pike moves on hoping for a chance to start somewhere. jimmy should be here for the next decade at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore's biggest problem is that Clausen will already be signed on a long term deal at a great price. If he plays well or not he might be a victim of Richardson's new austerity budget. I expect he will play well but don't know if we will pay him as much as someone else will. If we don't sign him or tag him, he will be free to go elsewhere with no compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really like saying certain players have "ceilings." This isn't basketball, every year players drafted in late rounds or not even drafted show up and make an impact for their team.

I think(based on what I've heard/seen) that he is driven to get better and that's all that really matters.

The truth is that some guys can get away with being very talented and not all that driven. Vick did not have a very sound work ethic but he was talented enough to get away with being lazy. It'd be nice if the guys that worked the hardest were always the best/most talented but unfortunately life ain't fair.

Moore doesn't have the same physical tools as Clausen and that does matter. It doesn't mean Clausen is better or that he's going start but his ability level is a strong component in the reasons why he should start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

The truth is that some guys can get away with being very talented and not all that driven. Vick did not have a very sound work ethic but he was talented enough to get away with being lazy. It'd be nice if the guys that worked the hardest were always the best/most talented but unfortunately life ain't fair.

Moore doesn't have the same physical tools as Clausen and that does matter. It doesn't mean Clausen is better or that he's going start but his ability level is a strong component in the reasons why he should start.

Ability level actually doesn't have that much to do with quarterback success in the NFL or a lot of big time busts would have been stars. Russell had all the talent in the world but we all know how they turned out. Look at Brees for example. He hardly is the best guy from a talent point of view. Brady is another guy who doesn't have great physical skills. But both of them understand the offenses and defenses inside and out and are very successful. What is between your ears is infinitely more important that how well you throw the ball.

Link to comment

The truth is that some guys can get away with being very talented and not all that driven. Vick did not have a very sound work ethic but he was talented enough to get away with being lazy. It'd be nice if the guys that worked the hardest were always the best/most talented but unfortunately life ain't fair.

Moore doesn't have the same physical tools as Clausen and that does matter. It doesn't mean Clausen is better or that he's going start but his ability level is a strong component in the reasons why he should start.

Physical skiils actually doesn't have that much to do with quarterback success in the NFL or a lot of big time busts would have been stars. Russell had all the talent in the world but we all know how they turned out. Look at Brees for example. He hardly is the best guy from a talent point of view. Brady is another guy who doesn't have great physical skills. But both of them understand the offenses and defenses inside and out and are very successful. What is between your ears is infinitely more important that how well you throw the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physical skiils actually doesn't have that much to do with quarterback success in the NFL or a lot of big time busts would have been stars. Russell had all the talent in the world but we all know how they turned out. Look at Brees for example. He hardly is the best guy from a talent point of view. Brady is another guy who doesn't have great physical skills. But both of them understand the offenses and defenses inside and out and are very successful. What is between your ears is infinitely more important that how well you throw the ball.

what makes Brees so good is how well he throws the ball.

just sayin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physical skiils actually doesn't have that much to do with quarterback success in the NFL or a lot of big time busts would have been stars. Russell had all the talent in the world but we all know how they turned out. Look at Brees for example. He hardly is the best guy from a talent point of view. Brady is another guy who doesn't have great physical skills. But both of them understand the offenses and defenses inside and out and are very successful. What is between your ears is infinitely more important that how well you throw the ball.

I'm not disputing that but saying it doesn't matter at all like the original poster was saying isn't true either. I should probably say talent/ability over physical as that's not quite what I meant. I was just trying to emphasize the technical parts of the game over mental. Russel was more potential and measurables than being technically sound. He was going to need a lot of coaching to reach his potential.

Clausen throws a very nice ball, that counts for something. It's not the most important aspect of who you would want to start but that could tip the scales in a close competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this has been said before..does clausen having a chip on his shoulder, or something to prove from being taken in the second round, actually help him? That might make him want to work harder and put in the extra EXTRA time to become what everyone said he wasn't or wouldn't become. So a second round jimmy may end up being better than a first round jimmy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this has been said before..does clausen having a chip on his shoulder, or something to prove from being taken in the second round, actually help him? That might make him want to work harder and put in the extra EXTRA time to become what everyone said he wasn't or wouldn't become. So a second round jimmy may end up being better than a first round jimmy?

i bet 3rd round jimmy would rape matt moore in the face just to prove he could beat him in face raping...

i don't know if that made sense, i'm tired, i'm going to bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what makes Brees so good is how well he throws the ball.

just sayin.

I was listening to an interview on Sirius NFL today with Brees and that is not what he said. He said the key to success for him was finding passing lanes to throw the ball and trusting his guys to be where they are supposed to be. He admits to not having a big arm or great mechanics but said that being able to feel pressure and move around until he can find someone open is the key to his success. He said that having a compact motion and quick release to get the ball out quickly was important as well.

That what what he was just sayin..................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His footwork has been discussed many times over related to not just within the pocket but the quality of his drop backs and how while his receivers have been an issue his own footwork has created issues with his receivers. It is a mutual give and take dynamic after all. As far as his deep passing goes I will happily admit I saw some very impressive long throws from Bryce later in the season and I said so at the time and I'm still saying so now. That doesn't mean that there still aren't issues and beyond some instances of him flat out missing receivers deep that he knows he needs to get corrected I think there are still some throws to the sideline that defenses are going to test Bryce on early and often and until he can prove he can beat defenses on those throws consistently they will play him the same way. As far as talk of Bryce being top ten and the metrics that define that different people are going to have different answers and I've said before after the conclusion of the 2024 season that I'm going to try to put yardage aside in some cases and just focus on what Bryce is doing both between the 20's moving the ball and how our redzone scoring percentage is looking. The biggest thing I'm looking for this season is scoring points. Not just field goals. Touchdowns. If the offense is moving consistently and reaching the end zone more often than not and not squandering drives and settling for field goals then I am going to be content for the time being. I do not expect miracles this season. I expect development competiveness and both sides of the ball particularly the offensive given the investments we've made trending upward. And no blowout losses. I don't think that's an unreasonable ask do you agree? 🫡
    • It's also worth noting that Cam himself said that he felt safer when running vs. sitting in the pocket because he could see the contact coming and could better prepare for it. A QB running the ball doesn't have to be a sledgehammer. He just has to be effective.
    • That Falcons game is about as good as it gets. Especially on the road. I know the Falcons defense was bad but he was cooking with Coker, an undrafted rookie get the bulk of the receptions. If your QB has 5 TDs and 0 turnovers he is playing like a top QB, yardage be damned. The big question for me is how consistently can be play the whole season?  I don’t expect a game like that every week, but I also don’t want to see any performances like the pre benching or that Cowboys game (which was bad post benching). Bryce’s best shot at being the guy is becoming a mini-Burrow who is about as consistent as you can get at the QB position.  The good news is this QB class should be a fun one. So hopefully Bryce becomes the guy, if not it’s a nice class to let DC pick his QB and they should come into a great situation with a good OL, RB, young talented WRs etc…
×
×
  • Create New...