ESPN analyst held in Conn. on child porn charge

[Matt Foley]

Both you and Sylvanialight are f**king idiots.

You are trying to tell me that it is not as bad to posess child porn as it is to produce it? Are you serious? ARE YOU f**kING SERIOUS?

I will tell you what I think, I think you have gone soft in the f**king head.

This bastard and any bastard that either produces or watches/looks for child porn needs to be put the f**k down.

To even concieve that it is in any way shape or form not the most horrendous thing possible to participate in this activity it is beyond idiotic.

I don't care if it is a 17 year old girl that turns 18 in 2 days. It is f**king sickening. They are taking the most precious thing to a child of any age, and that is thier innocence.

I can't believe that any one would even try to condone/soften the effects of this.

f**king unbelievable.

What the fug is wrong with you? Chill out, dickwad.

A. The guy who gets his jollies looking at pictures on his computer

B. The guy who actually chats with little kids and meets them

C. The guy who films little kids and sells those images to A and B

If you can't see that C is much worse than B, and B is much worse than A, I don't know what to tell you.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

I can't figure out why anybody here gives a crap. It ain't like it relates to a Panthers board. Is he the only person that got arrested for child porn this week?

I know, right? I only care about the Panthers. Who cares about what else is going on in the world?

[Matt Foley]

While your right, all 3 of the dudes still need to do time in prison.

The idea that C wouldn't produce the material if A didn't exist is a specious argument anyway. He'd still make it, he just wouldn't make money off of it.

I don't mean to defend the guy. What he did disgusts me, too. It's just the Salem witch trial mentality that scares me. People look at all kinds of fugged up poo on the internet. How many of us on here looked at the Erin Andrews video?

[Lumps]

I'll go against the grain and applaud you for having the guts to say this.

Here's an analogy. If you bust up a dogfighting ring, are the assholes who just came to watch as guilty as the ones who abuse the dogs (and other people's dogs) to get them to fight? I don't think so. I mean, they disgust me, but not nearly as much as the guys getting their hands dirty. What I want to know is how these pervs know where to go to find kiddie porn, while the feds don't. Why can't we catch the bastards who film stuff like this? We caught the guy who posted Erin Andrews videos online.

Here is a better question to ask yourself myself.

If no one ever came, bet on the dog fights and then sat and watched them would there still be as many dog fights?

HIGHLY doubtful, no profit, no exposure basically means two sickos, alone doing sick poo which happens but not to the extent.

More people looking at child porn=higher demand+profits=higher exposure=more children being exploited.

There is no excuse to defend this. The people that look at it do as much damage as the ones doing it, just in a different way but still at the same level.

The dude is sick in the head, for sure, but there are far worse people out there that kill, rape, and abuse people/animals every day. THOSE people are "f**king sickening". This dumbass is just a perverted little scum monkey who has some screws loose, got caught with his pants down, and will pay the price behind bars most likely.

Yes there are worse people like murders and rapers. They should be put down too IMO. I don't believe he has his 'screws loose', I bet he knew exactly what he was doing. He is labeled a 'predator' for a reason.

Guys he does hard drugs do you think while he was snorting all that coke he was looking at his nonexistent son taking a bubble bath?

[Davidson Deac II]

While your right, all 3 of the dudes still need to do time in prison.

The idea that C wouldn't produce the material if A didn't exist is a specious argument anyway. He'd still make it, he just wouldn't make money off of it.

edit:

Oh yeah and I'm so amused by the double standard of guys who lust and drool over young girls in bikini shots or porn and then get all "we have to protect the children!!!".

I hope you all have little girls one day.

Fwiw, if 18 or 19 year old guys are looking at 16 year old girls, I don't see anything wrong with it. If 45 year old men are doing it, then thats wrong.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Can 18- or 19-year-old guys look at child porn?

[Davidson Deac II]

Can 18- or 19-year-old guys look at child porn?

No one should look at child porn. Its illegal and immoral.

The reason I brought it up was that someone earlier in this thread mentioned some teenage stars who were 16 or so. I don't see anything wrong with the younger posters looking at them. But for someone my age looking at some of those girls is wrong.

[RockyTopVol]

He's the guy that did the Football Today podcast. I used to listen to him every week when I'd mow the lawn.

Just disgusting.

[SmootsDaddy89]

I'd let Selena Gomez make macaroni art on my dick.

[Matt Foley]

True story....when I worked at nascar.com there was a team PR guy who was probably the best in the biz. Name is Chip Williams. Everyone thought he was a creep, but we were not prepared for the headlines that came out one day...he'd been meeting young girls, as in 11-13 years old, whom he had chatted with on the internet, for sex. He's been in prison for at least eight years that I know of.

I like to think that every time Chip gets passed around the shower room, he thinks about his victims and how they must have felt.

Makes it kind of hard for me to have the same outrage over some schmuck who looks at stuff online. It disgusts me, and for the life of me I'll never understand why people are attracted to people outside their own age group, but I personally know someone who is on a whole nother level of sickness, and deserves a whole nother level of hatred. Just my feeling on the subject.

[kdrh5]

Should 30- and 40-year old women who oozed over Taylor Lautners shirtless RL cover shoot be looked at as creepily as the old men beating off to Britney's 'hit me baby one more time' video or is it okay because hes a guy?

[Matt Foley]

Should 30- and 40-year old women who oozed over Taylor Lautners shirtless RL cover shoot be looked at as creepily as the old men beating off to Britney's 'hit me baby one more time' video or is it okay because hes a guy?

It's okay because he's a werewolf.

[Panthers_Lover]

I'll go against the grain and applaud you for having the guts to say this.

Here's an analogy. If you bust up a dogfighting ring, are the assholes who just came to watch as guilty as the ones who abuse the dogs (and other people's dogs) to get them to fight? I don't think so. I mean, they disgust me, but not nearly as much as the guys getting their hands dirty. What I want to know is how these pervs know where to go to find kiddie porn, while the feds don't. Why can't we catch the bastards who film stuff like this? We caught the guy who posted Erin Andrews videos online.

One word: Yes.

[Matt Foley]

One word: Yes.

Only if you look at the word guilty the same way you look at the word pregnant...as in, you can't get a little bit pregnant.

One came to a dog fight for entertainment. The other stole pets from people's yard, dangled those pets in front of the monsters he was training to fight, starved his fighting dog to make it nice and angry, then unleashed this poor animal on someone else's monstrosity. As much disdain as I have for the guy who goes to a dogfight, there ARE degrees here.