Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pick 3....


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

So I was looking at our past drafts and I found out that the last 4 drafts have produced 12 starters. This doesn't include guys who get significant playing time either...like Stewart, rosario, barnidge, brown, or munnerlyn. It also doesn't include guys fighting for a starting spot...like Connor, Robinson, Irvin, and Schwartz.

So that's an average of 3 starters per draft in the last 4 years. So pick 3 players from this years draft that will be entrenched starters in two years.

Some are more obvious than others...here's mine:

1) Jimmy clausen

2) Brandon lafell

3) Eric Norwood

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think this draft class has 5 capable starters, but they might not all get the chance for this team...(in order from most likely to start to least likely)

Starters

1. Brandon LaFell

2. Jimmy Clausen

3. Greg Hardy

4. Eric Norwood

5. Tony Pike

Key Rotational Guys (may eventually start)

1. Armanti Edwards

2. David Gettis

3. Jordan Pugh

Special Teams players

1. Robert McClain

2. R.J. Stanford

This how I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pugh has a tough climb to unseat Martin, but I think time will determine that this was our best draft.

Lafell should start. I think he will this year, eventually.

Edwards will start in 2 years, when Steve Smith is 33 or so. We will need the spark.

Clausen will as well. I think this is Moore's last season with us; if he plays well, he will cost us too much--poorly, we go with our other 3 QBs.

Rashawn Jackson was not drafted, but I think he will become better than Fiametta.

Hardy has the size to take Brayton's spot by next year, but I wonder if he has the toughness.

Norwood could be so good that he finds a home at SLB. He is a true football player and they will want him on the field.

Gettis is a dark horse. He could be no better than Drew Carter, but he is rough and has a tremendous upside.

Pugh could move to CB if Marshall leaves.

Lotta ifs, but we have gotten great value in our recent drafts. E. Brown, Connor, Jarrett (don't laugh), Kalil, D. Williams, Clausen (top 10) were all predicted to go in the first round (Williams went 28th, but was a top ten projection on some sites). Lafell was a second round lock, Norwood was to be gone in the third. Hardy was predicted to be a first round lock in 2008, before injuries and weight issues dropped him. Pike was a third rounder.

The draft has cracks, and when talent falls, like Duke Robinson, we mop up. It has been successful. We didnt need Connor--we had Beason and Morgan (I think).

Free agency? we went after proven special team players who give us depth. Wright, Hudson, Francisco, Witherspoon, etc. were good special teamers. Got better on a budget.

Between 2010-13 (the length of their 4 year initial contracts), it is possible that all 9 of our draft picks in the 2010 draft will not make what Julius Peppers made in 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the people saying Greg Hardy.If he starts then who wont?

Charles Johnson or E.Brown.

I see Brown as more of a 3rd down specialist. I think that he will see more playing time than he did last year but he will still mostly be used to push for sacks. Which isn't a bad thing he is VERY good at pressuring QB's.

Johnson will possibly be starting and I think that he deserves it. Could end up being a great DE. I know that people were saying he was the strongest player on the team last year. Could be a beast this year.

Honestly I don't really see Hardy starting but I thought I would throw his name out there. He has the potential to be VERY good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...