Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats close to trading Diaw, Chandler, aquiring Calderon


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

You can't point the blame on MJ because a four-team deal fell apart in reguards to the Beasley trade. And I really feel that MJ is right in holding out Tyson Chandler, even if this deal is dead. Chandler would have essentially been a throw-in to this deal, and his expiring contract has much more value than that. With possibly the best available center, Al Jefferson, going to the Jazz, Chandler may now be the top option for teams looking for a big man. Chandler's value to us, and to everyone else has gone up.

At least we know that MJ and company are actively trying to make the team better. While his drafting hasn't been that great, a lot of the recent trades have been spot-on. I trust what MJ and Larry Brown are doing.

I give you the Beasley trade, but why were they so far into this Chandler trade if it was a bad trade for the bobcats to begin with? Chandler was convinced he was traded and most reported this trade as being done and only needing league approval.

Indecisiveness... MJ and company wasted Toronto and Phoenix's time while creating a bad impression of the Bobcats organization to all the players involved. That's how this whole thing appears to me. All signs point to a last second moments of the bobcats second guessing themselves which is a sign of weakness and suggests someone didn't realize what they were giving up to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give you the Beasley trade, but why were they so far into this Chandler trade if it was a bad trade for the bobcats to begin with? Chandler was convinced he was traded and most reported this trade as being done and only needing league approval.

Indecisiveness... MJ and company wasted Toronto and Phoenix's time while creating a bad impression of the Bobcats organization to all the players involved. That's how this whole thing appears to me. All signs point to a last second moments of the bobcats second guessing themselves which is a sign of weakness and suggests someone didn't realize what they were giving up to begin with.

How many times have "SOURCES" by ESPN, Yahoo, or other outlets been wrong? How many times have we read about a trade that never happened. Unfortunately we do not know what exactly happened or why the trade hasn't gone through yet but I don't think we should paint the Bobcats organization and MJ has indecisive and wasting another teams time. The only thing we can do is wait and see.

Now my opinion is simple I like the fact that they are trying to free up some money. Getting Diaw off the roster would have been great. Everyone talks about a 12m expiring Chandler that is so attractive to have. Well sorry IMO the 2011 free agent class is nothing like the 2010 class so his expiring is not that important. Maybe the when Diops contract is up that might be in a year worth something so we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give you the Beasley trade, but why were they so far into this Chandler trade if it was a bad trade for the bobcats to begin with? Chandler was convinced he was traded and most reported this trade as being done and only needing league approval.

Indecisiveness... MJ and company wasted Toronto and Phoenix's time while creating a bad impression of the Bobcats organization to all the players involved. That's how this whole thing appears to me. All signs point to a last second moments of the bobcats second guessing themselves which is a sign of weakness and suggests someone didn't realize what they were giving up to begin with.

They were negotiating. Deals fall apart at the 11th hour all the time in the NBA. We also don't have any idea what the various trade structures were being discussed, especially when you look at all the different versions the Toronto media reported. The lastest deal that was reported was decidedly in Toronto's favor, so it only makes sense that we were trying to negotiate for something more, and killed the deal when Toronto refused.

The real problem here is that the Raptors were far too loose lipped about a deal that had not been finalized. You should NEVER put anything about making a trade on your team page until that trade has been agreed upon in all parts, and the league office has approved it, and the media should confirm the facts before running with a story, neither of which happened up in the Great White North. That's what got the fans all worked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just Some More Info (By the way don't be suprised if this trade gets done later in the month or something like that)

It appears that the Toronto Raptors are not going to jettison their two most-burdensome contracts in one deft move. While Hedo Turkoglu is still likely heading to Phoenix, a related deal that would have sent point guard Jose Calderon and forward Reggie Evans to Charlotte for forward Boris Diaw and centre Tyson Chandler appears dead due to hesitation from the Bobcats’ end. One source with knowledge of the trade said the deal was likely dead, but did not give up hope that it could be revived later on Tuesday.

Source: National Post

The part of a complex Raptors deal that would have sent Jose Calderon and Reggie Evans to Charlotte is dead, killed by Bobcats owner Michael Jordan according to league sources. The teams had signed off on the transaction that would have shipped Boris Diaw and Tyson Chandler to Toronto early Monday afternoon – with Chandler being told he was to become a Raptor – before it died later in the day.

Source: Toronto Star

A proposed trade that would have brought Toronto Raptors point guard Jose Calderon to the Charlotte Bobcats is on hold and might be dead, according to a source connected to one of the three teams involved. The Bobcats have expressed reservations about going through with the deal that also involves the Phoenix Suns. That is despite them informing players of the possibility they would be traded. Bobcats center Tyson Chandler had already expressed to Yahoo! Sports that in his mind he was already a Raptor.

Source: Charlotte Observer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...