Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Madden 11: Complete Panthers roster ratings


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Good News: Jstews speed went up and Calussen, Lafell, Norwood look like great substitutes starters.

Bad news: Deangelo's trucking and injury rating went down...Delo will be coming out every other game this season.

Armanti Edwards 88 speed is lower than I would have thought but David Gettis is a 92.

Seems like more of the same....I play in a league where the trades have happened so no Harris or Peppers...struggle to make tackles and turnovers...but not terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha wtf? What do you consider swagger in a video game?

apparently it's a "clutch" rating or something like that. if you get in a rhythm and are making good plays back to back your players stats increase. some players perform better under pressure than others. Jimmy Clausen has a mid 80's swagger, while Matt Moore only has it in the 60's or something.

it's dumb, the only reason it's "Swagger" is because Old Spice bought advertisement in the game so they call it "Madden Old Spice Swagger!"

should have just called it clutch rating..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh alright, was there a clutch rating in madden 10? I will have to go check that. I hope they made it so that Smitty no longer drops random balls that hit him right in the hands. I know that he had some drops due to Jake last year but they lowered his rating so much it is just stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...