Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who made beason apologize to TO and Why?


CatfanMO

Recommended Posts

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement. He never said HE didn't want TO but said that based on the philosophy of the FO, that TO wouldn't be a Panther due to locker room issues "for whatever reason". People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement. He never said HE didn't want TO but said that based on the philosophy of the FO, that TO wouldn't be a Panther due to locker room issues "for whatever reason". People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Welcome to the world of blogs. Reading comprehension needs to be sacrificed in order to fill up the blog with news everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement....People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Panthers LB Jon Beason said he’s sorry about his comments concerning Terrell Owens, in which he objected to the receiver’s possible presence in Carolina.

“I have to apologize for my comments regarding TO,” Beason wrote. “I personally would want him on our team in Carolina. He’s been a great WR for a very long time and will without a doubt be a hall of famer.

what was that about no reading comprehension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm willing to bet it was the panthers front office.

Highly unlikely.

The safer bet is this guy.

648a25798c5af17ab9385cf508eb0ed0.jpg

Rosenhaus represents both Beason and Owens. Right now, he's having a hard enough time finding work for Owens. He certainly didn't need statements like the ones Beason made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

now this is didn't know. i don't keep up with agents.

it makes sense.

Pretty much.

Owens isn't what he once was on the field, and that was the only thing that made teams willing to try to put up with his antics.

Nobody thinks he's worth it anymore, especially not at the salary he wants (5 million a year).

Beyond that, given their philosophy this season, even if Owens weren't a locker room cancer I seriously doubt the Panthers would look at him.

(someone will probably come on and argue that they should, but there's really no good logic behind that idea at all)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what was that about no reading comprehension?

The original comment needed no apology. The reading comprehension came from that. He apologized for how it came across because people "read into" his comments. Any intelligent poster on here who has SOME knowledge of how the Panthers' organization works, knows that TO would never come here - Beason pretty much stated that ownership wouldn't bring him in.

He didn't diss TO - actually, he kind of defended him by saying "for whatever reason" that TO was a locker room distraction. He didn't say "TO is a locker room distraction", just a perception that Beason didn't really know why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
    • I was ok with the mentor aspect of keeping Dalton, but wow has he fallen off the deep end. The slow behind the WR interception was awful. I keep hearing our WRs created no separation, but on that particular play dude was wide open and Dalton couldn't get it to him with a clean pocket. Next year, we need to address the backup QB spot haaaaaard!
×
×
  • Create New...