Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who made beason apologize to TO and Why?


CatfanMO

Recommended Posts

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement. He never said HE didn't want TO but said that based on the philosophy of the FO, that TO wouldn't be a Panther due to locker room issues "for whatever reason". People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement. He never said HE didn't want TO but said that based on the philosophy of the FO, that TO wouldn't be a Panther due to locker room issues "for whatever reason". People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Welcome to the world of blogs. Reading comprehension needs to be sacrificed in order to fill up the blog with news everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to apologize and he didn't apologize - he clarified his statement....People make a mountain out of a mole hill and have no reading comprehension.

Panthers LB Jon Beason said he’s sorry about his comments concerning Terrell Owens, in which he objected to the receiver’s possible presence in Carolina.

“I have to apologize for my comments regarding TO,” Beason wrote. “I personally would want him on our team in Carolina. He’s been a great WR for a very long time and will without a doubt be a hall of famer.

what was that about no reading comprehension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm willing to bet it was the panthers front office.

Highly unlikely.

The safer bet is this guy.

648a25798c5af17ab9385cf508eb0ed0.jpg

Rosenhaus represents both Beason and Owens. Right now, he's having a hard enough time finding work for Owens. He certainly didn't need statements like the ones Beason made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

now this is didn't know. i don't keep up with agents.

it makes sense.

Pretty much.

Owens isn't what he once was on the field, and that was the only thing that made teams willing to try to put up with his antics.

Nobody thinks he's worth it anymore, especially not at the salary he wants (5 million a year).

Beyond that, given their philosophy this season, even if Owens weren't a locker room cancer I seriously doubt the Panthers would look at him.

(someone will probably come on and argue that they should, but there's really no good logic behind that idea at all)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what was that about no reading comprehension?

The original comment needed no apology. The reading comprehension came from that. He apologized for how it came across because people "read into" his comments. Any intelligent poster on here who has SOME knowledge of how the Panthers' organization works, knows that TO would never come here - Beason pretty much stated that ownership wouldn't bring him in.

He didn't diss TO - actually, he kind of defended him by saying "for whatever reason" that TO was a locker room distraction. He didn't say "TO is a locker room distraction", just a perception that Beason didn't really know why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...