Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Expendables...Hit or Miss??


Dpantherman

Expendables  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Expendables

    • Hit
      14
    • Miss
      12


Recommended Posts

I'm gonna go see it just for the fact of seeing Jason Statham, Randy Couture, Arnold, Stone Cold, Stallone, Jet Li, Bruce Willis, etc. all in the same movie. This movie is just gonna be total man movie. Probably a stupid plot. Probably not the best lines in a movie. But its gonna look cool. Tons of explosions, blood, and carnage. Can't wait!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told my wife that most of the us from my work were gonna go on a huge man-date to see this movie when it comes out. She asked why she couldn't go. I asked if the idea of Jet Li kicking Jason Statam in the face while falling out of an exploding building got her excited in any way. She said no and told me to have fun.

This movie is going to be terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

check your man sack, if you report anything negative about thee great movie EVAR!!!!1!!!!!

While possible, it could also very easily be an "eh" type of movie that we as men will enjoy simply due to the fact of the cast and the amount of action. Then again, as you said, it could be amazing. I went into Inglorious Basterds with reasonable expectations, and its currently on my top 5 of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...