Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

socks with sandals?????

SorthNarolina

By SorthNarolina,
in Huddle Lounge

Socks with Sandals?  

39 members have voted

  1. 1. Socks with Sandals?

    • Yes
      7
    • No
      28
    • Pie with Sandals is much, much better
      4

Recommended Posts

SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

It seems like in the last year I've been growing fonder and fonder of them.

My feet don't get cold or clammy

My feet don't sweat if I'm wearing the rubbery kind

I can pop my toes without having to take off my shoes

Then of courses there is the usual benefits of sandals, easy to take on and off etc.

I've never worn the really high socks with them unless I was wearing some pants. I also haven't done it much in public. Mostly did it during late night study sessions exam week, movies, or a quiet lunch/dinner.

I'm probably too young for this but I can't deny it. It's very comfortable and convenient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

I hate it. It just looks...eh to me.

But let me clarify how I differentiate flip-flops and sandals.

Flip flops have the band that connects to the bottom of the shoe that separates your big toe from the rest of the toes (which, to me, is discrimination).

Sandals are just the band that goes over the top and you kind of just, slip your foot in.

Most people I see wear socks with flip-flops. I fuggen hate that. With sandals, I have been guilty. Mainly for all the reasons/circumstances that you stated in the OP (around the house, exam week, etc). Although, currently, I do not own sandals.

This is way to long. For your time, have some pie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
    • csx
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By csx · Posted

      Thielen's yards per reception was higher last year than any of Renfrows career.  His per game productivity last year as an old slow receiver the same as Renfrows 1 good season. These things are easy to find. 
    • t96
      Panthers' content round up

      By t96 · Posted

      With 1 more game but yeah hopefully Canales is better, obviously Rhule sucked. Better than Reich though and jury out on DC. Of course Wilks’ interim stint was the best we’ve had since 2017 but I give Tepper zero credit for that
×
×
  • Create New...