Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen running with the ones???


The Don

Recommended Posts

http://www.panthers.com/media-vault/videos/Matt-Moore-Postgame/3a3154e1-db82-411e-bd39-cc2f6f9d14a3#?id=c25fed8a-6358-419f-83d9-a8b4b6461ca3

At about 44 seconds into the vid, there's a shot of Clausen taking a snap from Kalil... Wharton was on the line, with DW and Jackson in the backfield. From what I could tell, this was the first string offense, minus Fiammetta. So riddle me this... why have Clausen take snaps with the ones so early in the preseason if he's just gonna be the backup? I'm sure he'll get time with the ones during practice in the regular season... but I kind of thought these preseason reps would all belong to Moore since he's the "unquestioned" starter...

Someone enlighten me. Couldn't find any info on this anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just seems like they're jumping the gun a bit, don't you think? I mean, he's gonna get hella reps in the 3rd and 4th preseason games.

or I'm reading too much into it. I bet he'd play even better if he had the starting offensive line blocking for him. He's probably tired of scrambling for his life since he had to deal with it all through college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about this, and was going to make a thread about it, but wasn't really driven to post anything until this was posted... BUT, I've been thinking... Moore was only tendered for 1 year this year.

Knowing he would be the starter and how he performed last year, why would we go and draft Clausen AND Pike anyway with other positions of needs. You don't draft Clausen to sit behind another guy for his entire rookie contract.

The more I've thought about it, I think Clausen was less about this year and more so about the years to come. I really think we're just letting Matt play out this year and then letting Clausen take over as the cheap, young QB future. I really believe JR's plan to get all the old guys out and clear salary had something to do with us taking Clausen. Moore, along with DLo and all those guys are pretty much being used for 1 year... Depending on what happens with the lockout, I think we'll extend DLo, TD, and Kalil once an agreement is made.

And if that all works out without having to franchise any of those guys to bring them back, I believe we'll franchise MM and then trade him to the highest bidder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about this, and was going to make a thread about it, but wasn't really driven to post anything until this was posted... BUT, I've been thinking... Moore was only tendered for 1 year this year.

Knowing he would be the starter and how he performed last year, why would we go and draft Clausen AND Pike anyway with other positions of needs. You don't draft Clausen to sit behind another guy for his entire rookie contract.

The more I've thought about it, I think Clausen was less about this year and more so about the years to come. I really think we're just letting Matt play out this year and then letting Clausen take over as the cheap, young QB future. I really believe JR's plan to get all the old guys out and clear salary had something to do with us taking Clausen. Moore, along with DLo and all those guys are pretty much being used for 1 year... Depending on what happens with the lockout, I think we'll extend DLo, TD, and Kalil once an agreement is made.

And if that all works out without having to franchise any of those guys to bring them back, I believe we'll franchise MM and then trade him to the highest bidder.

That is a huge question at this point. There is quite a bit of doubt about who will be here and who will gone. At this point all I am not sure about Willliams or TD. We will have to see how the LBs look this year and how Stewart holds up. Kalil may be here because Justice was released who was the backup center and Bernadeau looked bad in the role. BTW Kalil being in there with Clausen could simply be because we got no other center to snap the ball. We don't really have Justice anymore now that he has been cut. We will likely pick up another center at some point down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a huge question at this point. There is quite a bit of doubt about who will be here and who will gone. At this point all I am not sure about Willliams or TD. We will have to see how the LBs look this year and how Stewart holds up. Kalil may be here because Justice was released who was the backup center and Bernadeau looked bad in the role. BTW Kalil being in there with Clausen could simply be because we got no other center to snap the ball. We don't really have Justice anymore now that he has been cut. We will likely pick up another center at some point down the road.

Yeah, but how do you explain Wharton being out there, and DW? Kalil, I can see that as a possibility... but even so, seeing this kind of clarifies where our QB's stand. Moore, Clausen and then Cantwell... and I honestly wish we would just get rid of Cantwell. He's sooooo horrible. But anyway, I have a feeling that Moore will be franchised at the end of the season too and then traded. There's quite a bit of teams looking for a starting QB right now. Perhaps the Chiefs would like to do business again? Cassel looks like a down-syndrome baby after he gets sacked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am happy for him. I like Moore but Clausen will eventually surpass him. Moore right now is a better option but Clausen seems to have more potential. I loved the way he called out defenses and wanted control. I want to see how he looks against first team defenses. I think he will be great and I am loving this pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...