Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Second look at ravens game...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Just rewatched the first half and let me say that it's not nearly as bad as I thought. Honestly it was just sloppy play. The penalties really slowed down the offense and the only thing that worked against the defense was four straight screen plays and poor footing on the field. Other than that I actually feel that we fared better than last years first preseason game...which says a lot considering the young players. Here are a few observations after watchig the tape:

1) I don't think Derek landri got nearly enough credit for the push he got throughout the game. He was who flushed out bulger on norwoods sack/fumble.

2) Everette brown looked to be a step off in the wrong direction...seemed like he was always there but just out of position enough to not make the play.

3) I thought it was just my eyes the first go around but I think we will all have to get used o clausens ducks...throws the ball very similar to mcnabb. Kind of a spiraling Quaker that could be tough to catch.

4) fiametta did a heck of a lot more than throw that one block that sprung Williams. He had about three other nice ones plus a couple grabs...looks lightyears better than last year.

5) special teams blunders cost the panthers 3 points and gave the ravens 3 points with the long return. A 6 point swing that can't happen for us to e successful this year. We should fire Danny crossman!!! Oh...wait...we did that already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we will be fine as you said penalties were a bitch for us along with dropped passes which was a momentum killer.

I still want to see Clausen start a preseason game against 1st teams. Good time to test, its preseason no pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take away those gross penalties and moores numbers would have been fine...and the defense pressured the qb's all night will playing a very soft coverage scheme. What more can you ask for??? Now all we need is to improve this week against an even better defense and an even better run game. Should be a good test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3) I thought it was just my eyes the first go around but I think we will all have to get used o clausens ducks...throws the ball very similar to mcnabb. Kind of a spiraling Quaker that could be tough to catch.

You would think someone who has had a coach since they were 10 years old would know how to throw a spiral. Well who am I to judge his balls.

ballk.gif

ball2k.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally speaking I dont think preseason is ever really as bad or as good as we perceive. From a team aspect it is very hard to tell.

1. Offenses are purely base vanilla.

Much more difficult to pick up blitzes which can cause a domino effect for the offense. Can't get in rythm and constantly pressured.

2. Coaches are evaluating individuals and lineups so they are more likely to sub here or there to see what works.

Some things to watch and may be foretelling if they continue through all games include

1. Penalties: Not just 1 game but consistent.

2. Dropped Balls

3. Special Teams

4. Long Snapper and FG kicker

Just my 2 cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything I've read on Clausen praises his arm strength and his ability to throw the football with pace and precision. Those awkward spirals he threw the other night aren't characteristic I don't believe. A soaked football is difficult to grip and certainly weighs much more so I'd be willing to be that had something to do with it. The couple wobbly balls were due to him just having to put everything he had into the pass due to the ball and conditions thus taking away some finesse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think someone who has had a coach since they were 10 years old would know how to throw a spiral. Well who am I to judge his balls.

Yeah, he wasn't doing too good of a job with the throws IMO. They had two slow-motion shots of two different throws and they both looked very unstable.

Again, Fiametta was very impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we will be fine as you said penalties were a bitch for us along with dropped passes which was a momentum killer.

I still want to see Clausen start a preseason game against 1st teams. Good time to test, its preseason no pressure.

I have come to see many, many..well many losses due to penalties oft indirecty through incentive losses. Gross, I ignorantly believe, is the major Panther if not the NFL king of Falsies! The guy is great, but I was not feeling the love on Thursday...but I was Yeungling'd and pizzed over the "roll" he was on.

Still, I was thinking Baldymore...newbies up the wazzu...short term starter time..and figgered shee at, a 6-9 point loss is oky doaky with me, if we just doan give 'em the easy QB run in...I was half happy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...