Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we try to sign a new returner?


AceMan

Recommended Posts

We definitely need to try something different. To me, Munnerlyn and Sutton are below average...which is awesome when compared to the rest of our group.

To me, AE is done as a returner. I wanna see Witherspoon/New Guy compete for the job now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a new ST staff? But for the short term, I would say find someone.

We need help in the worst way.

Tonight's poor ST play had absolutely nothing to do with the coaches. These were not scheme issues.....these guys just can't catch the damn ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Munnerlyn and Sutton are below average...

Just what are you looking for? Someone to take it back for a TD every return? As long as they catch the ball and get a few yards they will be more than fine. As they say, it is a game of field position. I'd rather have a consistent returner who gets x number of yards instead of one who gets little-to-none but breaks a big one every now and then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edwards probably killed any chance he had of being activated this season.

That's the sad part. I don't mean to be critical only into the 2nd preseason game...but AE looked uncomfortable enough for Zod/Gantt to talk about stashing him on PS way back during training camp. And from what I've seen in the 1st game and heard in tonight's game, he is just not a returner.

Witherspoon, Goodson, somebody new...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...