Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would it be worth the risk?

Udogg

By Udogg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Udogg Enthusiast

Udogg

Posted
Posted

Do you think it would be worth the risk to put Steve Smith in for a few series or maybe even a quarter to see if we can get something positive going in the pass game this weeekend? Or do you think the risk is too great? I am on the fence on this one. You always have QB's and WR saying they need to work on timing and getting the feel for each other, do you think TC practice is good enough?

Thoughts?....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dpantherman Newbie

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

He won't play in the preseason. Why in the hell would we risk another injury to him for a meaningless game? I'm pretty sure he knows the routes already and doesn't need practice catching balls, although he's already doing that.

I don't think he'll get hurt playing 2 or 3 series

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

Third preseason game is supposed to be when everything is clicking. We need our offense to click in this game. Having Smitty in there will do that and build for a good start for the regular season. Like I said mentally it would be a good thing for the whole team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...