Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The morning coffee


hepcat

Recommended Posts

starbucks sucks and is way overpriced!

I'd sooner drink McDonalds coffee than the poo they sell at Starbucks!

Good thing Canada has Tim Hortons

Starbucks isn't that bad price wise, Americanos & plain coffee's are cheap that expensive sh*t they sell barley resembles coffee.

Nor-Cal has "Peetes Coffee & Tea" which was the original inspiration for "Starbucks" they have amazing beans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starbucks isn't that bad price wise, Americanos & plain coffee's are cheap that expensive sh*t they sell barley resembles coffee.

Nor-Cal has "Peetes Coffee & Tea" which was the original inspiration for "Starbucks" they have amazing beans.

peetes is pretty great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

by the time everyone fills my coffee up w/ creamers, milk, etc, it doesn't even taste like coffee anymore, i hate coffee. but i drink cappuccino and espressos on occasion

I wrote a blog post saying that most coffee drinkers don't like the taste of coffee, just as most beer drinkers don't like the taste of beer. Most people just don't like bitter flavors, so they drink coffee that is just full of sugar, and they drink beer without much flavor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, a lot of the people that flood their coffees with sugar and cream don't realize that bolder coffees don't have to be excessively bitter. Starbucks is a prime example of this. I tried several of their city blends and hated them, but found that their darker roasts (like Cafe Verona) are actually pretty decent.

Starbucks actually roasts/burns their coffee excessively to make it taste stronger than it is.

I need my coffee in the morning! Although I do have my doubts about how much more productive it actually makes people. :idea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't like coffee or beer the first time i tried them. knew the effects though and kept drinking. now i like them both, and try different ones often.

Exactly. They're both acquired tastes. You start with the weaker flavors before moving on to the stronger examples.

Starbucks actually roasts/burns their coffee excessively to make it taste stronger than it is.

Yep, and they're lighter roasts are the worse for it. I do like their darker roasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...