Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TO says there is a double standard between him and Favre


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

"Had it been one of us doing some of the same things, pulling these stunts that Brett Favre has done the last two or three years, then we would be labeled 'not a team player,' 'selfish,' and these are times where you want your guys to be in camp, bonding with your teammates, learning the plays, going through the whole team concept just like everybody else," Owens said, via our friends at CSNPhilly.com. "And now it's like, yeah, he's set himself above team standards."

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/08/to-takes-aim-at-brett-favre/

What do you guys think? Is Favre getting a pass?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree that there is a double standard. For the most part, Favre has behaved much better throughout his career than Owens has. If Brett had worn a Chicago Bears jersey to a Green Bay/Chicago game, or said during the season, that he made a mistake by going to Minnesota, or any of the other numerous stupid things that Owens has said or done, his treatment would be much worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a reason T.O. is labeled "selfish" and "not a team player" and it has nothing to do with Favre.

Favre hasn't really gotten a pass. He's been one of the most ridiculed players in the league ever since he started straddling the fence about retirement. Sure some people still praise him, and yes, teams still wanted him (the Jets and Vikings) because he can play. Which is exactly why T.O. keeps latching on with teams despite all of the baggage that comes with him. In that sense, they both get a pass.

The only real difference I see is when things go bad for the team, T.O. begins pointing fingers and becoming a distraction. Favre doesn't really point fingers or become a distraction (by his own doing) until the offseason.

T.O. has earned his label and so has Favre

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a reason T.O. is labeled "selfish" and "not a team player" and it has nothing to do with Favre.

Favre hasn't really gotten a pass. He's been one of the most ridiculed players in the league ever since he started straddling the fence about retirement. Sure some people still praise him, and yes, teams still wanted him (the Jets and Vikings) because he can play. Which is exactly why T.O. keeps latching on with teams despite all of the baggage that comes with him. In that since, they both get a pass.

The only real difference I see is when things go bad for the team, T.O. begins pointing fingers and becoming a distraction. Favre doesn't really point fingers or become a distraction (by his own doing) until the offseason.

T.O. has earned his label and so has Favre

Pretty much sums it up.

The both of them have gained their "supposed" reputations; because of their actions.

T.O's labeled as a selfish, not very team-player friendly. While Favre is equally selfish, but his actions are rarely (if ever) heard "during" the season.

So all in all, yes. There is a Double Standard for Favre, but for T.O to call anyone out on their selfishness, is the typical Pot Calling Kettle Black analogy.

They're both ghey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...