Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodson


beastson

Recommended Posts

Don't forget the primary purpose of a Panther receiver is to block 8 yards downfield. Had Goodson shown us anything there yet?

Actually, he hasn't looked bad at all this preseason. I remember reading in training camp that he volunteered to take blitz pick-ups against Beason because "to be the best, you have to beat the best."

I've been saying we should use Goodson like the Saints use Reggie Bush ever since the day he was drafted. I'd love to see him catching those check down passes. Granted, I'd love to see more passes to all of our backs, and I think we will this year as we're waiting for the young receivers to step their game up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, he hasn't looked bad at all this preseason. I remember reading in training camp that he volunteered to take blitz pick-ups against Beason because "to be the best, you have to beat the best."

I've been saying we should use Goodson like the Saints use Reggie Bush ever since the day he was drafted. I'd love to see him catching those check down passes. Granted, I'd love to see more passes to all of our backs, and I think we will this year as we're waiting for the young receivers to step their game up.

I didnt respond because I sensed some sarcasm coming from his post with the "primary" word

But if he wasn't, passing plays? Why would he be in on a running down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's not bad, and the year let him grow a bit, but he's arguably our third best back on a team that's already run-heavy. Now if you just set aside whether Sutton is better, and whether or not Goodson would dress over him, then it's still "we have two backs that are top ten in the league and we don't have enough touches for both of them some games, why do we need to get cute with our extra backs?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say utilize Goodson as much as possible...show off his talents as a slot receiver and 3rd down back at times (if someone's dinged up) and in the kickoffs. Build his stock and sell right before trade deadline to teams decimated by injuries (if they occur)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say utilize Goodson as much as possible...show off his talents as a slot receiver and 3rd down back at times (if someone's dinged up) and in the kickoffs. Build his stock and sell right before trade deadline to teams decimated by injuries (if they occur)

Yep, this is what I was thinking too. Maybe line him up in the backfield and motion him to the slot for slant routes. I don't know if he could run deep routes well against CB's, but I would like to see him in short yardage situations, breaking LB's ankles through the underneath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, this is what I was thinking too. Maybe line him up in the backfield and motion him to the slot for slant routes. I don't know if he could run deep routes well against CB's, but I would like to see him in short yardage situations, breaking LB's ankles through the underneath.

You could really throw DC's for a loop by using Rosario at FB, Goodsoon at RB and have them both split out wide pre-snap for a four wide vs LB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's not bad, and the year let him grow a bit, but he's arguably our third best back on a team that's already run-heavy. Now if you just set aside whether Sutton is better, and whether or not Goodson would dress over him, then it's still "we have two backs that are top ten in the league and we don't have enough touches for both of them some games, why do we need to get cute with our extra backs?"

If we had an abundance of great receivers, I'd be inclined to agree with you. I really think that -- at least at this time -- Goodson could be a better slot option than anyone else on the team (save for Smith). It's a matter of getting as many of our best players on the field as we can at one time. To do this, I think you'll see lots of two tight-end sets this year, and lots of passes to the backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude i couldnt agree more, michael goodson is the same height and weight as reggie b. and probably as fast but might not be as lightning quick. and now, neither one of them has the highsmen trophy!!!LOL!!! at least with goodson youd know hes gonna at least get a couple kickoff return touch downs because of how fast he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...