Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Social Network

fitty76

By fitty76,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Wither Newbie

Wither

Posted
Posted

Lol, it does look pretty lame.

Facebook is not ghey, myspace on the other hand....

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DirtyMagic97 Newbie

DirtyMagic97

Posted
Posted

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

He's worth a lot but he would have to do a lot to turn that into cash. Facebook wasn't even making a profit for a long time I don't know if they are right now.

His "share" in the company makes him a billionare but he's still not ready to cash out just yet like the google guys did.

Having billions of dollars at that age would rule and suck at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wither Newbie

Wither

Posted
Posted

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

I'm pretty sure most of the events were before they were billionaires.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

It's a movie about some guys who made a website. The exaggeration bothers me in this movie because the actual topic is quite lame. I never said there weren't a lot of other movies I feel are way too exaggerated. Hell, I hardly watch movies and dislike most TV shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Panthers HC Dave Canales hints at adding more weapons for QB Bryce Young

      By strato · Posted

      I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • Raskle
      2025 Draft Re-Grades (Or, One Idiot Doubles Down)

      By Raskle · Posted

      How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • Basbear
      Who was the better HC - Rivera or McDermott?

      By Basbear · Posted

      I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...