Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I may as well be the 1st 2 say: Moore is NOT the answer


top dawg

Recommended Posts

It's like I believed all along: there is a reason Fox has been reluctant to get behind Moore. The guy is a back-up QB in the NFL, period. Don't give me all the crap about how this is the first game, blah, blah, blah. The Panthers are going nowhere fast with Moore at the helm. I am going on record before the the first half, of the first game, ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the Answer

depends on the Question

Is he Peyton Manning NO

Is Moore a full time starter for first time Yes

Will he throw ints YES

Will he look bad from time to time YES

Will he throw TD's to Steve Yes

Anyone that expected Moore or Clausen to come out first game of season and light it up

Then He's not they Answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's average as hell and is fame is outplaying Jake when he fell off.. Smitty making him look better just get the ball to him and Moore's dick riders can say we are overreacting.

Smitty didn't make him look better today. He put the ball right where it needed it to be. You might wanna look in the mirror before telling someone else they're overly supportive for one side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...