Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Picking apart the truth: Panthers lack playmakers


Laetitia

Recommended Posts

(By Tom Sorensen, [email protected]) EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. -- It looked too much like last season. Jake Delhomme opened 2009 by throwing four interceptions against Philadelphia. p/His replacement at quarterback, Matt Moore, opened 2010 Sunday by throwing three interceptions and losing a fumble against the New York Giants Here's what was evident, yet again: When the Carolina Panthers play their football, they're fine. They hand off. They grind out first downs. Occasionally DeAngelo Williams breaks a long run. Sometimes they pass to Steve Smith or a tight end. They did this in the first half against the New York Giants Sunday and it worked well enough that, going into the third quarter, they held a 16-14 lead.

More...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read any of that, but if there's one thing we don't lack-it's playmakers.

What we do lack however, is creative coaching.

The fact that the announcers were sitting there telling us today whether each play was going to be pass or run, was embarassing.

Agreed,

We have plenty of talent on this team, the problem is the coaching staff starting with Fox.

Bland, Boring, No Creativity, Predictable, and Repetitive play calling is what the truth is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We lack a playcaller.

typical observer putting all the blame where it doesn't belong. Carolina either had the lead or trailed by only a single score up until the 4th quarter. With this roster you play a certain brand of football. Asking Moore to be Peyton Manning is poor coaching/playcalling.....not a lack of playmakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...