Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Today's office debate: Dinosaurs that would do ok today.


pstall

Recommended Posts

Smaller dinos may do ok. My thinking is, though, if modern man is still the dominant animal on the planet in this hypothetical universe, then the largest of the large would have been hunted to extinction long ago.

If all bets are off on the "modern man" thing, I'm betting some of the winged dinos would have eventually overtaken the food chain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sarchosuchus

40 ft. long crocodilian that some believe still survives somewhere in the world

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcosuchus

Megalodon Carcharodon

biggest shark ever... some theorize that it may still exist...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalodon

Then you have some of the small burrowing mammalian species that did survive (pretty much) but evolved into other things...

...and of course, some arthropods like cockroaches...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...