Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do we miss most?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

My thoughts...

Offense: Nobody, but if we were forced to take one back, here's the order I would put them in.

Vincent: All we need is a downgrade in our pass protection. But he does do well at run blocking.

Delhomme: If we had to take anyone back, I would take Jake solely for his leadership in the huddle. No doubt he would have gotten those guys pumped up in the huddle enough to open a hole for Stewart on the goal line. On the flip side, he may have turned it over before we got there. But the future is now, and we don't need him back to succeed.

Moose: He just got too old, couldn't get separation last year and wasn't doing a great job catching the ball. He can't leap high enough to snag an overthrown ball and doesn't have the speed to run under it.

Hoover: Fiametta's blocking isn't the problem.

Defense - Chris Harris

The most glaring problems we have on defense are in the secondary. Harris was a little slow, but he was the leader and made sure everyone had their defensive assignments. I think we miss Harris more than any other player

Peppers: Just for his talent alone he comes in second, but really the line is doing fine without him.

Lewis: Don't miss him a bit, Landri and the rotation are more effective at applying pressure

Diggs: I don't see any drop-off. In fact, for a while yesterday Anderson was leading the team in tackles. When was the last time that happened from the SLB position?

Kemo: I can't even think of a reason to want him on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otah doesn't count, he's still on the roster.

And he wouldn't fix our passing offense anyway.

Not sure about that. Otah would allow Schwartz to play guard. This would improve our running game which in turn would make things much easier in passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not want him to be a starter under Fox, but looking at how fractured this team is looking, I miss Delhomme the most.

So far I have not seen that fire in any other player. And when Steve acted like an ass and punched our team-mate he handled the entire situation like a true leader. He came out there and won games for us on the road without him but at the same time maintained the relationship he always had with our best player.

That is what a leader is to me. And that's what this team needs more than anything on offense. We have SO many holes to plug on offense right now. QB, O-line, receivers, OC playcalling....etc. Leadership will not fix all of those, but it will certainly help.

It's like if you have a car that has a million problems and you know eventually you need to replace a transmission, engine, tire, etc..yeah you have to fix them sooner or later, but in the mean time I would feel much better with a mechanic for a father that can patch it up and get me to work, than I would with a stingy dad, even if he was rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moose without an effing doubt. I realize we were going for the whole youth movement, but you don't cut a serviceable No. 2 when there is no clear heir-apparent on board. Tell me Moose couldn't have at least been a decent No. 3 this year.

Moose played very well once Moore came in last season, and is only two years removed from a near 1,000-yard season.

Not only that, but he would have been a great tutor to players like LaFell, Edwards and Gettis. Because it's clear our front office has no ability to develop a receiver on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I did not, this reminds me of another live action type video game that never made it and has a huge cult following. Thanks for the 90s nostalgia frend!! My gods do I miss that era at USAs peak and it was my best on many aspects too. 
    • Many layers my frend- Panthers had a draft recently. They picked 4 defense players. Each player picked 11, 22, 33, 55 as their number. For some players that number match the round or pre-draft round rank, example- Prince was a 3rd rounder and choose 33. Nic was a 1st rounder on some mock drafts and Dan Morgan said they had him as a 1st, he picked 11. Cam Jackson recently switched his number to 55, same as draft and has been telling Dave he wants to be special over and over.  The 44 was to add GOAT feels, thoughts, and more intrigue to this rookie phenomenon. X files cause it was a great TV show and maybe it was playing when this theory came together.......   I hope this helps!      
    • The best things Purdy has are certainly important tools for any QB. His accuracy his timing his decision making etc. I feel like he is a high end Teddy Bridgewater. You can compete and win in the regular season with this especially in a weakened NFC but where his limitations come into focus is when you are trying to contend for a Super Bowl you are going against elite and in some instances generational QB's like Mahomes. And when the time has come for him to go up against Mahomes he simply can't get it done. Now certainly he is not alone in that regard and people will point to another highly regarded QB such as Josh Allen who also cannot get by Mahomes. But the difference I see is Allen is not IMO at a phsyical disadvantage in that matchup whereas Purdy is. And that is with what had been to this point a comically stacked roster around Purdy and let's be clear we cannot understate that regardless of which side of the fence we land on in this debate. Purdy has had a top 5 roster and a top 5 coach. And the last time they went to the Super Bowl they leaned on McCaffrey extremely heavily. Now with what they are having to pay him and divert limited resources elsewhere they face a steep climb to get back to the Super Bowl let alone actually win it.
×
×
  • Create New...