Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Back To 2001

beastson

By beastson,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

We're not winning more than 4 games, so I advise everybody to accept that now so it wont hurt as much

I thought we would go to the playoffs, 10-6. The losses we had thought otherwise. This isn't 04, where we had a fire leader in Jake and a great coach in Fox. Fox is a lame duck now, and him benching Matt after 2 single games showed that

I just said like last week after that benching that this team is going to explode sooner or later (Smitty). What Fox did showed a lot. He even played him AFTER an concussion. Thats not the Fox we all know. And if he has no control and just make random decisions like that, then the team will sooner or later get out of control. Only people wasn't surprised about the move was the fans and media, because yall started begging for it. It was not a good move period because Clausen is a rookie. This is NOT Vick/Kolb. Clausen is NOT Vick. Im not going to touch on Jerry, no need to

We got a lot of young talent that's not ready right now. Panthers are back to 2001. That Buc fan was right, lets keep it real. Prepare for a long and disheartening season

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PeteRozelle Apprentice

PeteRozelle

Posted
Posted

2001 was a better team. They could atleast score points.

Far better. We were competitive in almost every game. Which is why I never gave much credit to the turn around John Fox did here.

Was it a good job? Absolutely, but not as big as some make it out to be.

The 2001 team was also more enjoyable to watch, although far more hearbreaking cause they lost most of their games at the end of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

Far better. We were competitive in almost every game. Which is why I never gave much credit to the turn around John Fox did here.

Was it a good job? Absolutely, but not as big as some make it out to be.

The 2001 team was also more enjoyable to watch, although far more hearbreaking cause they lost most of their games at the end of the game.

Yeah but it did build character for our team for 2002 and 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Johnstonny
      Ekwonu doesn’t get dog walked under 2 minutes in the 4th, we drive, kick a FG and win

      By Johnstonny · Posted

      Icky is a marshmellow....
    • UnluckyforSome
      TNF: Rams/Seahawks

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...