Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WHat was Jeff Davidson F'ing thinking in the last few plays of the game?????

AnalyzeThIs#28

By AnalyzeThIs#28,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

AnalyzeThIs#28 Newbie

AnalyzeThIs#28

Posted
Posted

We had this game, and running the ball with no time outs and getting negative yards is just ridiculous! Why not though the ball and set up a game winning field goal. I'm so damn heated right now I don't know what the hell to do.

F the Saints, I hope Brees has an aneurysm tonight and dies!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MaineManPanther Newbie

MaineManPanther

Posted
Posted

We had this game, and running the ball with no time outs and getting negative yards is just ridiculous! Why not though the ball and set up a game winning field goal. I'm so damn heated right now I don't know what the hell to do.

F the Saints, I hope Brees has an aneurysm tonight and dies!

Our passing game sucked the whole game, we lost Smith, and have a rookie at QB at the Saints Dome. I can see why they would run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Baschski Newbie

Baschski

Posted
Posted

None of you would be bitching about D-Will's decision if he had broken the tackle and scored. It was extremely close and we've all seen him break that for a long run dozens of times. I blame the O-Line moreso than Davidson...they have been pathetic all season and you just cannot give up a sack in that situation. Props to Gettis for a hell of a catch though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AnalyzeThIs#28 Newbie

AnalyzeThIs#28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hey, I still hate Brees. He's the only reason the Ain'ts are worth half a cent or so. Without him, they would be the like the Browns.

I'm just saying we had this game, and of course the f'ing Captain muffed the ball which lead to the Ain'ts winning. Without that we would have won..... hands down!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tondi Newbie

tondi

Posted
Posted

If we wanted to run the ball why not at least spread the field and run out of a passing formation? When you line up in that set the D knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are running and since we realistically needed at least 5-7 more yards for a FG there was little chance of us getting that out of that formation anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...