Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank and Buck show.

KBRed

By KBRed,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

KBRed Community Regular

KBRed

Posted
Posted

Really don't know if this has been mentioned and didn't know where to put it. I listen to 610 am consistently, but I cannot listen to Frank and Buck anymore. STUTTERING should not be allowed on the radio!

Not only do Frank and Buck stutter, but every guest they have on there does, as well. It's not a quick stutter, but a long Fa, Fa, Fa....Fox?, Football?, Fooseball???

Someone has to be better, right?

***I give Dan Morgan a break if he has ever stuttered on there show for obvious reasons.***

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Henne Given Sunday Newbie

Henne Given Sunday

Posted
Posted

frank and buck ill give them a pass....they arent professional radio guys. They are ex players, and they do a decent job. the occassional stutter or wrong word? sure. but its not the end of the world.....

Now....adding Natrone Means???!? holy fugin poo! How did the program director talk with this guy 5 minutes and think "hell ya lets get this dude on the air" ?!!?

He cant finish a sentence without stuttering like a 1 year old. if he has a problem, that sucks, and im sorry, but radio is NOT the profession for you!

If iam on my lunch break, and i turn on Frank and Buck and hes on....i either cry for an hour....or turn off the radio to save myself from wanting to jump off a cliff.

ITS THAT BAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boo7382 Newbie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

I listen to pacman all the time. Mostly listen to 610 in the morning on the way to work....

I dont listen to Frank and Buck but a couple of my friends told me that it SUCKS beyond all sucking of radio shows. haha my friend Mike was like they sound like a bunch of fn idiots and its difficult to even listen to them talk and get sentences out.

Based on that recommendation, I try to avoid it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mayor Qumiby Collaborator

Mayor Qumiby

Posted
Posted

Man am i the only one who likes the show?? I mean i don't really mind if they aren't as polished as a colin cowherd (sp??) But its good entertainment ... i usually end up laughing my ass off, These guys have alot of fun in the booth.. and to me i like it because its more like being at a bar or with a few friends talking football rather than just being a normal radio show ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
natty Newbie

natty

Posted
Posted

I like their show even though I usually only listen to a little bit of it. It's easy to look past the fact that they aren't professional radio guys imo. They have pretty good insight and a good perspective even though I always disagree with Buck.

I don't know who the stuttering guy is but he sounds like someone who used to stutter real bad but worked on it to get better. I have a friend who is the same way. It's not annoying if you're used to it I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skew Newbie

Skew

Posted
Posted

I listen because it's on. Both know their football. Frank isn't too bad but listening to Buck talk gives me a headache. Last year, Buck would always put down Peppers, now he's all in his jock. Can't figure out what his deal is. Sometimes he just seems like a Panthers hater.

I haven't heard Means yet. Sounds like it's a good thing I haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...