Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How can anyone justify Moore over Clausen at this point?


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

100% of Brad Smith's passes are TDs...see how stat's mean nothing? I'm done arguing with you because obviously you are set in your ways that not turning it over somehow trumps scoring points. I just don't see how that makes sense but I'll take the high road and wait until we play the 49ers to see what makes sense.

So how many passing attempts does Brad Smith have this year compared to Moore and Clausen?

Sorry - that's an apples to oranges comparison.

Got anything else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you thought wrong... but don't take my word for it, go to one of these ESPN chats and ask an expert what the # 1 job of a QB is, you'll get the same answer.

P.S. the # 1 job of the QB is to protect the ball (maintain posession) because there is a direct correlation between the QB maintaining posession and winning.

Not close. The main job of a running back is to gain yards and protect the ball.

The job of the quarterback is to direct the offense, read the defense, make approriate adjustments and either hand off the ball or throw it to make first downs and score points. If all the Qb had to do was protect the ball he could kneel down 3 times every possession and punt. Maintaining possession as you yourself said is a function of making first downs, moving the sticks and scoring points. Clausen has done none of those. In his three games he has averaged less than 100 yards a game and less than 5 yards an attempt. Only 24 of his 91 passing attempts have gone for first downs. That translates to 2 passing first downs a quarter or 8 a game. On third down he is 7 for 29 on making first downs or 24%. Absolutely dead last in every category way below that other rookie, Bradford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point was that stat's can be skewed any way you want them to. Moore doesn't have that many pass attempts either but you make it seem like his whole career he has been a turnover machine when that's not true.

I'm talking about this year, comparing what Moore did last year to what Clausen is doing this year would not be fair either.

Once again, we'll have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you not get that even with Moore's interceptions he has still put up more points per game than Clausen?

Or if you can't answer that...What good is not being able to move the ball even if you don't turn it over?

Right, 2% more scoring and 7% more interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...