Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So if we do end up with the #1 overall pick, this is what you do...


R0CKnR0LLA

Recommended Posts

New coaches always want to bring in "their guy" regardless of where the current QB was drafted and how much the organization has invested in him. Hell, Josh McDaniels even ran an established young Pro Bowler in Jay Cutler out of town so he could bring in his own guys and trade away half of last years draft for The Golden Calf of Bristol. Use this to your advantage.

Your new/interim HC goes on record as saying they will look at upgrading every position. When asked specifically about QB, be EXTREMELY non-committal about sticking with Clausen. Don't call him out and say he sucks, just give the typical PC answer, "well QB is the most important position on the field and we'll look at improving every aspect of the team blah blah...".

Then start scouting all the top QB prospects heavily. Go to their pro days, interview them, keep an extra eye on them during the combine and Senior Bowl. Eventually, bring in a few of the best QB prospects for private workouts.

Hopefully one QB has risen to head and shoulders above the rest and is the unanimous #1 top prospect (Andrew Luck maybe?). After weeks and weeks of heavy scouting, to where it's becoming more and more obvious to the public you will draft a new QB, go ahead and bring in this top prospect for contract negotiations.

Meanwhile, the Bills sitting at #2 or #3 overall were hoping to land their top prospect franchise QB are now in panic mode. Amidst this panic, they'll inquire about trading up and we'll go on record as saying we have no plans to give up the best QB in the draft. The opportunity to land a QB of this magnitude doesn't come along very often and there's no way we pass it up unless we're offered numerous 1st round picks.

Few days later leak to the media we are close to finishing contract negations and should have our new QB and #1 overall pick signed within the next few days. Bills should be back on the phone and at this point, we reluctantly negotiate down to taking the Bills #2 or #3 overall pick and a 2nd rounder (in either 2011 or 2012 works).

Then go ahead and take Patrick Peterson or AJ Green like you were going to do anyway and enjoy you're newly found 2nd round pick.

And remember what they say...

pimpin-aint-easy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news is that we didn't invest that much in Clausen, so it wouldn't be the kind of setback it is when you use a high first round pick on a QB.

Personally, I'd like to see us trade back and get more picks to rebuild our defensive line. I'd like to see us stick with Clausen and bring in a veteran QB and veteran WR's to help him out... it's much easier to address the DL in the draft than it is QB or WR, the percentages of success are much higher when drafting a DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember guys, this is the Bills we're talking about. The same team that just traded Lynch for a 4th and 6th without fully shopping him and calling around the NFL. Since teams have come out and basically said, hey they never called us to tell say he was on the trading block, we would have given them even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was less about who we should actually take 2nd/3rd overall and more about just screwing the Bills out of their 2nd round pick.

If you pull it off, there's no reason then you can't do the same thing with the next QB on the list (Jake Locker?) and trade down again a few spots to the next QB hungry team.

Patriots pull this kinda crap all the time. They made Denver trade up just one spot with them last draft because they had them convinced they would take Bay Bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
    • I dont know. He seems like a bigger douche now than ever. I didnt hate him for being a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...