Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HDMI Cable


DirtyMagic97

Recommended Posts

So, about a year ago I purchased an HDMI cable to use for my PS3. I purchased a $130 Monster Cable. I'd like to get another one for my Xbox that is in another room from the PS3. After I spent a pretty substantial amount of money on the first one, I read online that there really is no difference in quality if you purchase an expensive one or a cheaper one. Does anyone know if this is the case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HDMI is digital. It carries nothing but zeroes and ones. It could be made of a wire hanger and have the same performance.

(Okay, not really, but you get my point. All high speed hdmi cables are manufactured to the same specifications.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world the idea that all cables are created equal is in fact true.

The reality though is that you get varying degrees of materials and craftsmanship. With an el-cheapo cable you may get a connector that's poorly soldered and clamped on the cable. Or insulation thats susseptible to interference from other sources. Or wires inside the cable that are misaligned or not wound to spec.

You might never notice a difference in the 5 dollar no-name cable and the 100 dollar one. Then again you might wonder why you seem to have worse motion blur than your neighbor seems to.

For my money, after spending what I did on the TV and the Blu-ray player the extra cash for a nice cable seemed insignificant. But I did buy a 30 dollar one for the cable box because its just not capable of the throughput that some of my other sources are.

just my .02

I think a nice balance between these concepts is the cables at monoprice.com. The cables are of good construction, and the videophiles I've interacted with over the years seem to love them. And they're inexpensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world the idea that all cables are created equal is in fact true.

The reality though is that you get varying degrees of materials and craftsmanship. With an el-cheapo cable you may get a connector that's poorly soldered and clamped on the cable. Or insulation thats susseptible to interference from other sources. Or wires inside the cable that are misaligned or not wound to spec.

You might never notice a difference in the 5 dollar no-name cable and the 100 dollar one. Then again you might wonder why you seem to have worse motion blur than your neighbor seems to.

For my money, after spending what I did on the TV and the Blu-ray player the extra cash for a nice cable seemed insignificant. But I did buy a 30 dollar one for the cable box because its just not capable of the throughput that some of my other sources are.

just my .02

from my understanding this is true of analog, not of digital. digital works or it doesn't. construction quality is certainly a concern but it isn't enough of a concern to spend 20x the money on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...