Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should coaches be "friends"?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Hypothetical question: How would you feel about coaches being off-field social friends with players that they coach?

Would this be a good thing for team chemistry, or is it better for coaches and players to have an arms-length, strictly professional relationship in the interest of objectivity?

Note: Knowing how some here think, I fully expect a response suggesting "Friend" Jennifer Aniston be hired as a coach. If you want picks of Jennifer, click here: Lovely Ladies Forum

(nimrods) :mad:

(now watch someone suggest Courtney Cox or Lisa Kudrow)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a much tighter community among coaches than the general working public, for obvious reasons.

edit - not enough coffee. I thought you meant coaching staff being friends with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was an enlisted Marine, then later an army reserve officer, so I've seen it from both sides. You can't work with people everyday in high stress situations and not become familiar and even friendly with each other to some degree. But there has to be a line that you do not cross to maintain the hierarchy of authority. There's a reason commanding officers are discouraged from fraternizing too much with their troops. I would think something similar would apply to the player/coach relationship dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's why most coaches don't last very long in the NFL. They get tight with the first group that buys into their shpiel, but then when those players lose a step (see: Minter, Rucker, Foster, etc) you are still sticking with them and losing the respect of the younger players who should be in their place. You believe in them because they believed in you, and you are unable to separate loyalty from performance, or even potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's why most coaches don't last very long in the NFL. They get tight with the first group that buys into their shpiel, but then when those players lose a step (see: Minter, Rucker, Foster, etc) you are still sticking with them and losing the respect of the younger players who should be in their place. You believe in them because they believed in you, and you are unable to separate loyalty from performance, or even potential.

Would you see that as less of a problem for longer tenured coaches, or more of one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He makes a good point about Wallace.  In fairness to Wallace it is hard to play your position as freely as you need to when your defensive line is getting pushed around like ragdolls.  One of the greatest attributes a defensive line has is sucking up blocks, freeing up your linebackers.  Our defensive line couldn't suck up a lollipop more or less blocks.  I think Evans, Sanders and Tremble are going to be a really nice TE group.  I can see all three getting time on the field.  If Sanders can improve as a blocker teams won't be so inclined to believe it is a pass play whenever Sanders is on the field.  Ryan Fitzgerald, I think was an awesome pick-up. Hopefully he can fill our kicker void. Luke Kandra many turn out to be our next Norwell.  Everything I have heard about him says he's a beast.  He needs some refinement, but the good news is he's got Hunt and Lewis (arguably the best guard tandem in the league) to learn from. 
    • Great teams build through the draft and have several young players that start that are on rookie contracts. It's important to hit on players in rounds 4 thru 7.  These should be future starters and solid depth.  When you hit on most of your picks you free up a lot of cap space for those one- or two-year players to fill spots you are thin at. No GM is going to perfect on all their picks.  You're going to whiff every once in a while.  That was Hurney problem.  He'd nail the first pick but after that it was reach after reach and we couldn't get any depth on this team. I'm excited about Morgan as our GM and hopefully he'll be around a long time.  It will be even better if Canales can continue to grow as a head coach, both in the development of young players and play calling. I remember last season after Young came back in the lineup and started to perform well.  We saw different plays I had only seen other teams use.   If Canales's play design and play calling continue to grow. Morgan and Canales will be linked together for a long time.  It would be nice to see a Coach and GM together for a decade or two. Go Panthers
    • They also came out for the encore and the singers were dressed in canes jerseys. Pretty fuging cool.  
×
×
  • Create New...