Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stat question about Matt Moore


hepcat

Recommended Posts

What percentage of Moore's completed passes were off of play-action? My guess is around 75%.

We ran the ball ineffectively a lot, but it showed a commitment to it and the D was caught off guard. Since Fox has been coach, the Panthers do best with the pass off of play-action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all, I commend the coaches for running lots of play action. They stuck to the gameplan I laid out weeks ago and it worked :)

Second, the running back sells play action more than the quarterback as far as the defense goes. This is a stupid thing made by announcers because it's so easy to zero in on what the quarterback is doing. it's sort of like the infamous "looking off" of recievers. Fans are trained that good quarterbacks do this every play and it is completely false. Some do it occasionally for vertical spread passing plays but certainly not for short yardage. If you watch Peyton Manning, aka the best in the biz, he doesn't "look off" recievers very often. He just scans the field incredibly quickly and switches from receiver to receiver faster than anyone else in the game until he finds someone open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he didn't sell the playaction well at all. our QBs never do.

He may have made some plays out of it, but just because we're in a running set and the back runs out of the backfield doesn't make it playaction. More often than not, Moore would drop back and fire a great pass into decent coverage. He made plays, and his receivers made plays. There wasn't a whole lot of fooling people with playaction - though it probably did happen on a few plays.

The offense just made things happen in our passing game yesterday - I honestly think the 3 WR sets were more advantageous to that than play action, but I may be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...