Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wade Phillips vs. John Fox


fjblair

Recommended Posts

Head coaching involves a lot of things that coordinating doesn't. Clock management, challenge decisions, choosing when to bench a guy, penalty decisions, etc.

When you're a coordinator, the overwhelming majority of your job is Xs and Os. You call plays, but you're not generally called upon to be a leader.

Wade is a superior Xs and Os guy, but deficient in many other areas.

My opinion: He'll always be a better DC than head coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Head coaching involves a lot of things that coordinating doesn't. Clock management, challenge decisions, choosing when to bench a guy, penalty decisions, etc.

When you're a coordinator, the overwhelming majority of your job is Xs and Os. You call plays, but you're not generally called upon to be a leader.

Wade is a superior Xs and Os guy, but deficient in many other areas.

My opinion: He'll always be a better DC than head coach.

I agree with you 100%, but I am also not thinking that he is the worst HC in the league.

IMO he is a pawn, JJ wanted a high flying O, and a high risk/high reward D. He got the O part and needed the D part....hence Wade. If I had to guess, I bet Wade would like to tone down the O side of the ball, but JJ won't let that happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you 100%, but I am also not thinking that he is the worst HC in the league.

IMO he is a pawn, JJ wanted a high flying O, and a high risk/high reward D. He got the O part and needed the D part....hence Wade. If I had to guess, I bet Wade would like to tone down the O side of the ball, but JJ won't let that happen.

Worst HC would be a tough choice. If you were to ask me to name guys that shouldn't be head coaches right now, Phillips would be on the list. I'd also say...

Chan Gailey

Mike Singletary

Eric Mangini

Tom Cable

Norv Turner

Jack Del Rio

Gun to my head on the absolute worst and it's probably between Singletary and Gailey.

Not that big a fan of Marvin Lewis, Josh McDaniels or Brad Childress either. Lovie Smith has made some bad decisions of late too, but he's not on my list just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bum was his daddy.

And on the topic, Fox is actually a better head coach than Wade. Phillips' teams have never even sniffed the Super Bowl. He has exactly one playoff win on his resume' (the one with the Cowboys) in six postseason trips. And that's with four different teams.

Fox may not be my favorite coach, but objectively speaking, Wade's not in his class by a long shot :nonod:

Good DC? Yeah. But you don't want him as a head coach. He's just not built for it.

I always called him bum bc he looks like a Bum. didn't know that was his dad's name...lol. I knew he coached the Titans, but i forgot his name i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Bum wasn't his given name :lol:

I'd have to look it up, though.

His given name was Oail Andrew Phillips... now you know why he went by "Bum." Oh crap, he's still alive! I was assuming he was dead, but dude is 87... He coached the Houston Oilers when Earl Campbell was a one-man wrecking crew RB there.

By the way, John Clayton said on ESPN this morning that John Fox is now a top candidate for the future vacancy in Dallas next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...