Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question: Donovan McNabb as a Panther in 2011?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Again, for those who didn't read - I said he would be used as a transitional guy until the young QB is ready (Clausen or ANDREW LUCK lol).

Secondly, for those arguing about 'isn't he a WCO guy?' Only because Andy Reid is. McNabb obviously doesn't lack arm strength, so he isn't a system guy. Additionally, if that impeded us form signing a vet QB in the past under Fox, someone should've told AJ Feely and Josh McCown (during his time with Raiders, may have been with Cardinals). So yeah, you need another reason to not sign him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sold on McNabb. I have nothing against him, he has compiled a fine career over all. But I think his best days are well behind him. The Eagles came to that conclusion, and had no qualms about trading him to a division rival in the process. THAT in itself speaks volumes. He's been injury prone in recent years, and he's taking a beating on the 'Skins this year so far. If he came over to us, he'd have to learn yet a new scheme and personnel. The 'Skins and him would be better off with each other for next year.

If I were to take a chance on obtaining a non-rookie QB, I'd take a look at Painter of the Colts or Hoyer of the Pats. I mention them not because of any significant career achievements, but they have been backing up true Hall-of-Fame QBs in their respective towns, and perhaps, because of that, they might bring something more than can be hoped for from other prospects. Combined with new (and hopefully better) coaching here, perhaps they would offer some promise! Given where we are at now, what would he have to lose? On the college front, the kid I like is Kellen Moore of Boise State. He's a junior this year, and I don't know how he is rated by the scouts, but I like watching him, and he keeps his poise and delivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have observed, Donovan, old and out of shape, injured hamstrings and all, is better than anything we have on our roster.

To me, it's a win/win, he gets to come into a place where he can do his thing for a year or so, and giving the younger players a chance to learn how to be a NFL QB.

In that scenario, I'd take a guy who has been there and done that to the SuperBowl level, in the arena itself as the teacher than someone who observed.

Just my thoughts. Of the possible free agents, he is probably the pick of the litter, and as bad as that litter may be, it's better than the litter we currently have, no matter the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have observed, Donovan, old and out of shape, injured hamstrings and all, is better than anything we have on our roster.

To me, it's a win/win, he gets to come into a place where he can do his thing for a year or so, and giving the younger players a chance to learn how to be a NFL QB.

In that scenario, I'd take a guy who has been there and done that to the SuperBowl level, in the arena itself as the teacher than someone who observed.

Just my thoughts. Of the possible free agents, he is probably the pick of the litter, and as bad as that litter may be, it's better than the litter we currently have, no matter the reason.

The one thing I give credence to in that is having a veteran QB who used to play at a playoff level available for our young QBs to learn from. THAT is the thing we are missing this year after having cut Jake loose. Moore had Jake on the sidelines last year to confer with when he came off the field, and I think that had everything to do with his perfomrnace over the last 5 games. McNabb could certainly provide that.

But as far as it being a 'win/win', in that McNabb would be able to 'do his thing', what 'thing' is that? If that doesn't result in wins, what would be gained with him as the starter? I don't know that we offer him a better cast of characters on the "O" side of the ball here compared to what he has in Washington now. Both "O" lines are suspect, that's for sure.

I agree that our QBs are suffering from not having a true veteran on the sidelines with and for them. But that's the only real role I see for McNabb, and I'll wager he still sees himself as a starter somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb can do what mid-tier NFL QB can do, he has done it, he can do it again; he has the arm, he still can move, and he can handle the ball enough to sell a fake, something neither of our young QBs do very well.

I am not a big Mcnabb fan, I'm just saying, of the available decent FA QBs, it will be McNabb as the pick of the litter. If not him, then why even bother.

He is not Peyton Manning, but, there are 31 other starters who aren't Peyton either. In every generation there is one great QB and Peyton is this generation's.

McNabb, I believe can still manage a game at a much higher level then anyone we currently have.

He is getting older and older equates to cheaper and stop gap and there is nothing wrong with that. Give him a front load bonus and a cheap contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, for those who didn't read - I said he would be used as a transitional guy until the young QB is ready (Clausen or ANDREW LUCK lol).

Secondly, for those arguing about 'isn't he a WCO guy?' Only because Andy Reid is. McNabb obviously doesn't lack arm strength, so he isn't a system guy. Additionally, if that impeded us form signing a vet QB in the past under Fox, someone should've told AJ Feely and Josh McCown (during his time with Raiders, may have been with Cardinals). So yeah, you need another reason to not sign him...

Not that im opposed to McNabb as a WCO guy but he def would not work in any other system. He took forever to learn the WCO and I would expect he would take way too long to learn another system. WCO=yes Anything else=No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb HAS done it...but age and injuries, I believe, have taken their toll. He may have a few decent years left though. He can throw a decent deep ball. Good game manager from what I have seen of him. He's thrown a TD-INT ratio of 7:8 paired with a 76.0 QB rating this season. IDK. Just depends on how good the OL is next year, who we bring in as a coach, etc.

Yeah, most of this has been covered in this thread already. But, who knows. I think he'd be a good vet for Clausen to look at though as his career comes to an end.

Probably not happening though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...