Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quick Question...


Zod

Recommended Posts

So are Moose, Hoover, Kemo and Harris. Seems like a wet dream at this point.

Two are out of the league, Kemo is second string, at least he is when Haynesworth is not acting the fool.

The ONLY player that MIGHT help is Harris, and honestly that is a big MIGHT.

Panthers problems are the D-line/O-line/WR/QB, attitude of the players, and give a fug mannerisms of the lame duck coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The veteran leadership would have been nice. If they were going to send the veterans packing they could have at least made some moves to avoid the current roster makeup. It is embarassing.

So you rather have a team full of old over the hill players that suck over young still growing players that suck now but should get better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physically I don't think guys like Moose and Hoover would be contributing much, but mentally/leadership wise, I think they would have. This team has talent... young, inexperienced talent, but talent nevertheless. There are issues with the lines, the QB's and with the coaches for sure, but good leadership is an issue too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...