Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which Richardson?


davos

Recommended Posts

Given the big guys current medical conditions, do you think Mark is starting to become the top decision maker? You would need a real insider to know this type of info for sure, but something is telling me Mark is beginning to have more influence than in the past.

I may and probably am dead wrong but could all of these changes be a sign of a move at the very top?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They talked about this on PTI the other day. How the sons take over the team from the Father. And how the team becomes a better team, because the son wants to prove he can do a good job. They didn't bring up the Richardsons, but hopefully in future conversations about this... they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know much about Mark, he good?

I saw an interview w/ him and he was saying how Jerry doesn't watch the games w/ him....Mark curses too much :dita:

But he was saying he watches the games in his own box and emphasized how he lives and dies Carolina Panthers football...from play to play...he seemed like he would be a very passionate, expressive, owner....which wouldn't be a bad thing one bit.

I like the guy a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The price to trade for him, would likely completely bankrupt our future draft assets. I would have been all for a Hendrickson or Parsons trade in maybe 2017 or 2018. But this team is so far from being good and needs SO much help to build, those draft picks are almost priceless.  Let's not forget the insane cost it took to get Bryce and how much that harmed our drafting ability.
    • People like to say that, but I don't know if it's true. We went a few years trying to answer the QB question on the cheap amid bad coaching. We did what other teams do and tried to address QB by giving up a king's ransom and moving up. I mean, I guess that could be considered a "splash move," but I see it more as trying to draft the next big thing at QB.  I think that he's been more impatient than anything else. He gave too much power to Rhule who didn't know what the hell he was doing and relied on Fitterer who left a lot to be desired as well. Sure, we may have tried to get Watson and Stafford, but that's all a part of trying to answer the question at QB. "Splash moves?" maybe, but I think it's just business as usual for teams without a QB. Parsons would be a "splash move," but he's about as sure a thing that you could acquire for the capital. 
    • Yeah, not sure about that unless we really have a dominant offense, especially running game. If not.....then what was it worth?
×
×
  • Create New...