Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ward 1, Hunter, maybe 2. Per McShay


 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 45catfan said:

There will be an early run on OTs, IMO.  Sanders falls.  How far?  How about I'm recent seeing mocks having the Steelers drafting Dart at #21 WITH Sanders still on the board.  I'm telling you, I saw just some snippets of Sanders Pro Day and it looked like he was throwing a medicine ball instead of a football.  Very little zip and the ball looked oversized/cumbersome to throw.

I could definitely see several OTs going high. 

Yeah, I just never got the hype with Sanders as an NFL prospect. Good college QB there just wasn't anything about his traits and not much about his game that I saw translating to the NFL. He just looks like the classic "good college player who doesn't translate to the NFL" IMO.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's not factoring in the "daddy factor" complication. You know Deion is gonna be sticking his nose in if things aren't going according to his plan. So you have to both fall in love with the (IMO) marginal prospect and deal with the helicopter dad with a huge microphone. Yeah, that'd be a hard pass from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jax is going Tet or oline... they have invested a ton of time on Tet and want to pair him with Thomas Jr. Somebody is gonna drop and I'm thinking it's Carter more n more. 3 is going to be Sanders... rather it's the giants or somebody going up to 3  or 4 to get him.  Jeanty is a raider. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

This Carson Schwesinger's season stats:  CRUSHES Jalon Walker's production that happens to be a second round prospect high second, but day 2 none-the-less.

image.png.899690c46998facb52c1b772754b16bb.png

image.png.264d25010619e803496f6fc98d46ea68.png

The difference is that everyone knows that Schwesinger projects as an off ball LB where as most think Walker can be an EDGE. He did both at UGA.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to to drafting Walker at 8 and Schwesinger at 57 if he's there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The difference is that everyone knows that Schwesinger projects as an off ball LB where as most think Walker can be an EDGE. He did both at UGA.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to to drafting Walker at 8 and Schwesinger at 57 if he's there.

That's part of my problem, Walker is a 'tweener and we fug those guys up--royally.  See Jeremy Chinn. Not only that, able to play two positions is very different than dominating at one.  This isn't the OL where the ability to play multiple positions is seen as a plus, or even a requirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That's part of my problem, Walker is a 'tweener and we fug those guys up--royally.  See Jeremy Chinn. Not only that, able to play two positions is very different than dominating at one.  This isn't the OL where the ability to play multiple positions is seen as a plus, or even a requirement.

Never understood the Chinn comparison,why not compare him to Luvu which makes more sense?  Oh i know because we used Luvu well so that doesn't support your argument

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The difference is that everyone knows that Schwesinger projects as an off ball LB where as most think Walker can be an EDGE. He did both at UGA.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to to drafting Walker at 8 and Schwesinger at 57 if he's there.

We will use him like Luvu, watch Dunc compare the 2

https://youtu.be/nt_aDTMX7DM?si=0Y7DYQ7sFKy2u10T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Never understood the Chinn comparison,why not compare him to Luvu which makes more sense?  Oh i know because we used Luvu well so that doesn't support your argument

Luvu was a FA that was coming into his prime.  Yes, he hit his stride here, but we didn't draft and mold him during his first contract.  So your comparison isn't exactly apple-to-apples either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Luvu was a FA that was coming into his prime.  Yes, he hit his stride here, but we didn't draft and mold him during his first contract.  So your comparison isn't exactly apple-to-apples either.

So you think comparing a safety to a LB makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My clued in Giants fan Buddy says #3 is Carter's floor. If he's there they're taking him.

I believe this. Giants owner kept the coach and GM for a reason and it wasn't to reach on shedeur

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I believe this. Giants owner kept the coach and GM for a reason and it wasn't to reach on shedeur

That being said, rookie QB does buy time normally.

Veteran QB usually means unemployment if things don't work out.

I should also mention I think the Giants will nuke the entire coaching staff and FO next offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ^I want that, but Rodriguez over KC. Don't hate KC as much at that spot, but rather take a WR with the pick we gain in that trade than in the 1st. 
    • I think there is good points in this thread to what the team needs to do. 1) Ball isn't really the issue but, he needs reigned in.  Coach and he need to realize when things aren't falling from the three and learn to play other facets of the game.  He's an amazing talent and when he's on, he's on.  But he can also shoot you out of a game.  We're lucky Miami went that way but that is too many missed threes.  He still needs to bulk up if he can, but he needs to drive more.  He's pretty good at finishing usually and hopefully the fouls come (probably not though).   2) The whole team needs to be more physical.  As others have stated, we need more bulk in our bigs.  Diabate is a hurricane of energy but cannot go against the larger centers.  I love him on the team but he should be more of a match up type guy or energy off the bench.  I think he'd be insane off the bench.  However I think the biggest issue with Diabate and Kaulk is the lack of offensive game.  The lack of a jump shot or anything.  Teams figured out to just leave them on the screen and crash lanes.  There has to be some sort of threat.  We need a 4 and a 5 that can do those things and stretch out the court. 3) Bridges.  He's just undersized.  However, I feel he really threw his all into it the last few weeks when others were gassed.  He was ok not being a focal point.  I'd like to have him off the bench as well but I assume he'd be traded to make things work.  4) Miller.  Dude can light it up when on, but disappears for quarters at a time.  Also he needs to work on ball handling and passing.  He's a turnover machine at bad times.  Also hopefully over the injury so he can bulk up too.   5) Kon. Just a rookie.  Long season and back injury.  I have no doubt he'll be back stronger and focused.  Needs to work on defense and physicality like the whole team but yes, a rookie he'll get there. 6) Coby.  Has to be resigned, no question.  The bench lineup is rough without him running the point.  Team has big potential and the front office seems sharp.  They seen the hive and how crazy it got and how much the city wants this.  
×
×
  • Create New...