Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grades: Panthers-Ravens


Laetitia

Recommended Posts

F- COACHING: Even if you didn’t think the mid-week decision to start St. Pierre was half-baked, they didn’t do enough to give the team as a whole the best chance to win. Take out the touchdown pass, and he averaged 3.1 yards per attempt. That makes it a miracle Goodson did anything on the ground.The defense continues to start slow and play undisciplined from there.

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/11/21/1856644/grades-panthers-ravens.html#ixzz15xvXuVXz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F- COACHING: Even if you didn’t think the mid-week decision to start St. Pierre was half-baked, they didn’t do enough to give the team as a whole the best chance to win. Take out the touchdown pass, and he averaged 3.1 yards per attempt. That makes it a miracle Goodson did anything on the ground.The defense continues to start slow and play undisciplined from there.

But John Fox said St. Pierre gives them the best chance to win. Nowhere did he ever say the coaching staff should "do enough to give the team as a whole the best chance to win" as Gantt claims.

Listen to Fox next time. Listen very carefully because he'll never take any responsibility for a debacle like this team and this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox deserves a Z.

St. Pierre deserves a D. He threw a great ball for a TD and made two bad decisions. Take those picks away and I wouldn't be mad for him starting next week.

I'm actually impressed he held on before making these mistakes for so long. He was pressured, hit, WR were dropping balls. And he just doesn't have chemistry with the team. He's only been here 4 days.

I give him a C on a curve grading

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he did it with less than a week of working with the team.

Jake, Clausen, Moore, Weinke, et al were able to pull off similar plays after they'd been on the roster for a much longer time. Hell, it took Jake many years to figure that out, it took St. Pierre but a few days.

But in some sick sense of not wanting to make this completely smart-ass, he did run the plays he was given (I'm sure he had no audible options with less than a week on the job) and given the situation I'm surprised we didn't see 3 runs and a punt. But think for a minute, would you rather him at least try to get the ball down the field or would you rather have seen 3 runs and a punt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...