Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

League, union hold positive talks on proposed 18-game season


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

per NFL.com

The source said the focus of the discussions was the proposed 18-game regular season and two-game preseason by the league and the union's counter-proposal for what it wants as part of an 18-2 season. Discussions centered on the players' strong desire to have substantially less offseason football activity and less overall contact in practices throughout the year. The players want a limitation on OTAs and reduced contact in other non-game settings. The goal of both sides is to offset increased exposure to injury in an 18-2 season, with decreased exposure during non-game activities.

According to the source, the players' negotiating team came off as reasonable, thoughtful and progressive in its approach.

story just broke a few minutes ago. looking like an 18-game season could very well be a possibility, and a big factor in negotiating the CBA...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when you say it's a big factor for CBA negotiations, is it positive or negative for the lockout?

Positive in preventing one. Owners want more revenue and see the 18 game as a way to generate it. The holdup will be the players want more money if they play 18 games while the owners will want the increased revenue but not to pay the players more. This way they will pay the players what they are paying now instead of asking for a 20-30% reduction in what they get.Still lots of issues to resolve but getting an 18 game season was considered vital to a new CBA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positive in preventing one. Owners want more revenue and see the 18 game as a way to generate it. The holdup will be the players want more money if they play 18 games while the owners will want the increased revenue but not to pay the players more. This way they will pay the players what they are paying now instead of asking for a 20-30% reduction in what they get.Still lots of issues to resolve but getting an 18 game season was considered vital to a new CBA

Then this pleases me. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya been watching nfl network alot today on my day off. They have been all over this the past hour. Anybodyhome posted something about this the other day, nothing really new from what he reported about 18 game season.(players want less ota's 2 in season bye weeks and less full contact pratices)La Canfora pretty much says 18 games will happen but need to hammer out the details I left in parentheses.

edit: as a side note they showed Jake in the browns locker room talking about his breakup with the panthers, says these things happen (saw just a hint of water in his eyes) and looks ready for this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

playoff teams already play up to a 20 game season so this is not going to cause a cascade of new injuries.

right. moreover, one of the specifics dictated in the article suggested that the players were trying to reduce the number of mandatory contact practices and OTAs, which, given the number of players that go down in practices each year, makes perfect sense.

i definitely see this as progress... it's also good to hear that the players union is making strides at bringing a progressive approach. i'd love to see this thing resolved long before the beginning of next season just to get it the hell over with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will less OTAs and practices, with fewer live practice sessions, reduce the complexity of many schemes? The fact is teams are going to be facing an awkward possibility that the players will not be able to get every aspect of a scheme before the season starts.

Ya that will be the owners arugment against it or something like that I'm sure. Granted I remember reading rookies would still have to show up early, so that will help. both sides need to find a happy medium somewhere in between and everything will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a certainty in regards to the 18 game season. Jason LaConfora was saying on NFLN just now that there will be no new CBA w/o an 18 game season to go along w/ it. So its happening, its just a matter of when everyone can get on the same page and get this shiz done.

its sounding like both sides are in favor of an 18-game season, though... i think the point of the article was that it's being hailed as common ground for both sides, which is basically a first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...