Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore Vs Jimmy Clausen


Urrymonster

Recommended Posts

Ok so I have seen a lot of people essentially saying that with Clausen we have no deep threat whereas Matt was able to force the issue more. Considering that I thought I would lay it out in black and white for everyone to see.

Matt Moore

Outside the numbers - Left

< 0 - 2/2, 13 yards, 93.8 QB Rating (1.5% of throws)

1- 9 - 14/19, 114 yards, 89.6 QB Rating (14.5%...)

10-19 - 1/3, 14 yards, 49.3 QB Rating (2.3%...)

20 + - 1/8, 23 yards, 1 TD, 1 Int, 39.6 QB Rating (6.1%...)

Middle

< 0 - 7/14, 44 yards, 1 Int, 27.1 QB Rating (10.7%...)

1- 9 - 23/26, 200 yards, 2 TDs, 1 Int 108.3 QB Rating (19.8%...)

10-19 - 5/11, 90 yards, 1 TD, 3 Ints, 64.8 QB Rating (8.4%...)

20 + - 5/11, 115 yards, 2 Ints, 43.9 QB Rating (8.4%...)

Outside the numbers - Right

< 0 - 7/9, 38 yards, 84.3 QB Rating (6.9%...)

1- 9 - 8/11, 62 yards, 86.2 QB Rating (8.4%...)

10-19 - 4/10, 65 yards, 1 TD, 2 Ints 56.3 QB Rating (7.6%...)

20 + - 2/7, 74 yards, 71.1 QB Rating (5.3%...)

Other Passes

5 Thrown away

2 Hit as Thrown

4 Batted Passes

1 Spike

13 Dropped passes

Jimmy Clausen

Outside the numbers - Left

< 0 - 8/9, 41 yards, 85.6 QB Rating (6.4%...)

1- 9 - 10/21, 119 yards, 65.4 QB Rating (15%...)

10-19 - 1/4, 14 yards, 1 Int, 2.1 QB Rating (2.8%...)

20 + - 3/6, 106 yards, 95.8 QB Rating (4.3%...)

Middle

< 0 - 8/10, 87 yards, 102.9 QB Rating (7.1%...)

1- 9 - 23/35, 182 yards, 1 Int, 66.6 QB Rating (25%...)

10-19 - 3/5, 42 yards, 87.1 QB Rating (3.6%...)

20 + - 0/1, 0 yards, 39.6 QB Rating (0.7%...)

Outside the numbers - Right

< 0 - 7/8, 18 yards, 1 Int, 39.6 QB Rating (5.7%...)

1- 9 - 11/20, 88 yards, 1 Int, 45.4 QB Rating (14.3%...)

10-19 - 7/17, 108 yards, 1 Int 38.4 QB Rating (12.1%...)

20 + - 2/4, 80 yards, 135.4 QB Rating (2.9%...)

Other Passes

15 Thrown away

3 Hit as Thrown

7 Batted Passes

1 Spike

13 Dropped passes

Analysis

"Matt Challenges Teams Deep"

Matt does have a nicer distribution from a statistical standpoint and he does have a higher attempt percentage than Clausen's when throwing over 20 yards. However in actuality, Matt completed just 3 more passes over 20 yards than Clausen did.

"We play a PA scheme with a vertical passing game"

Matt's best 'zone' was 1-9 yards in the middle of the field, exactly the area that people are critical of Clausen for throwing. Matt also threw 42.7% of his passes between 1-9 yards. Jimmy threw 55.7% of his passes 1-9 yards, however Matt was FAR more consistent and this is actually one of the area's that Jimmy is struggling with. For a scheme that 'relies on the deep ball' it's clear our OC didn't get the memo.

"Jimmy throws too many passes behind the LoS"

An area that people are critical of Clausen is his tendency to throw to or behind the LoS. Jimmy has thrown 26 passes into the backfield, Matt threw 25 or 19.1% of his passes, which is almost identical to Jimmy's 19.2%

"Jimmy Throws a lot of balls away and gets a lot knocked down at LoS"

A true statement. Jimmy has thrown away the second highest percentage of balls with 7.9% behind Alex Smith (8%), who are both well clear of the pack. He also sits in 7th with the most passes batted at the LoS (14.1%), with McNabb, Campbell, Sanchez, Fitzpatrick, Plamer & Bradford all having a higher percentage disrupted. Matt Moore was the 13th best with just 7.2%

Under Pressure

Matt Moore

No Pressure

106 Drop Backs (65.8%)

62/105 (59%), 1 run, 694 yards (6.6 ypa), 5 TDs, 6 Ints, 70.9 QB Rating

Pressure

55 Drop Backs (34.2%)

17/38 (44.7%), 4 runs, 163 yards (4.3 ypa), 0 TDs, 4 Ints, 13 Sck, 17.7 QB Rating

When Blitzed

52 Drop Backs (32.3%)

27/46, (58.7%), 299 yards (6.5ypa), 1 TD, 3 Int, 6 Sck, 58.2 QB Rating

Jimmy Clausen

No Pressure

129 Drop Backs (67.5%)

71/124 (57.3%), 6 run, 764 yards (6.2 ypa), 1 TD, 4 Ints, 64.7 QB Rating

Pressure

62 Drop Backs (32.5%)

12/43 (27.9%), 3 runs, 123 yards (2.9 ypa), 0 TDs, 4 Ints, 16 Sck, 29.9 QB Rating

When Blitzed

73 Drop Backs (38.2%)

21/58, (36.2%), 3 runs, 260 yards (4.5ypa), 0 TD, 2 Ints, 12 Sck, 55.2 QB Rating

Analysis

One thing is clear, both QBs seriously struggle when pressured and they are pressured a lot, ranking 5th & 7th in sack frequency. However they ranked 11th and 16th in frequency being hit, meaning they tend to not get many passes away 'just in time' but also that much of the pressure is just movement in the pocket. It would appear both get flustered when having to move around.

To be fair it would appear the OLine has blocked just about as well for both QBs and have performed about as well (or poorly as each other)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the data pool for this? Career? Season?

The only thing that really stands out to me (besides the throw aways) is Pressure and When Blitzed.

Everything else we probably already knew.

One thing I'd like to point out though. You say the scheme "relies on the deep ball" which I think is misleading. Not only are the deep balls very important but also the intermediate routes (the digs, comebacks, etc). So to say the "deep ball" is important then only compare completions of 20+ yards is misleading. In our offense, those 15-18 yard digs are very important as well and we throw them quite often (at least they were called quite often).

Bottom line, stats are for losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone here still believe in Moore? I honestly still think he is our best qb.

I wouldn't mind having Moore backup Luck next year. Matt thrives in the backup role and if he ever sees the field again he will want to show the same effort he did against San Francisco earlier this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This board has been inundated with stats from Clausen backers and Moore supporters left and right since the draft in April. What really happened was nothing more than a divisive line between those who thought Clausen should start and those who thought Moore should start.

What was even worse were the obvious sentiments that a Panther fan could not say anything on this board about either QB without being categorized. It was as if one had to choose sides. 11 games into a horrible season and those sentiments have died away along with any hope of being even the slightest bit respectable as a football team.

The bottom line? Neither Clausen nor Moore pass the eye test. Forget all the stats, forget your undying allegiance to the team and try to look at the play of both these guys- neither looks to be anywhere close to being starter material. And, to me, that's all I need to know about either one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bottom line? Neither Clausen nor Moore pass the eye test. Forget all the stats, forget your undying allegiance to the team and try to look at the play of both these guys- neither looks to be anywhere close to being starter material. And, to me, that's all I need to know about either one of them.

I disagree. I think with a competent run game Moore can be a successful QB. We've actually seen it despite how you want to categorize those games. Moore didn't have that this year and it showed. On the other hand Clausen has both had a run game and not had a run game and the results are the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I think with a competent run game Moore can be a successful QB. We've actually seen it despite how you want to categorize those games. Moore didn't have that this year and it showed. On the other hand Clausen has both had a run game and not had a run game and the results are the same.

the difference being, moore has had time to sit and observe from the sideline along with getting advice and help from a veteran...and played a few games. moore has been in the mix for a few seasons now.

clausen has had none of the above.

i don't support or hate either qb...but clausen is getting an undeserved bad rep from many people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...