Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Projecting a possible 3-4 defense for next year


Stroupe-a-loop

Recommended Posts

I wonder if a guy that traditionally runs 3-4 defenses came in would they consider leaving the defense a 4-3 because our personnel is such a bad fit for it. The opposite of what happened when Mike Tomlin came in. The difference being, instead of leaving a dominant defense intact, you are leaving an average defense in place to prevent it from becoming hot garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an example the Packers have made a pretty nice transition to the 3-4.

I believe they are #1 in points allowed on defense aren't they?

It can be done, but you better have some damned good coaching.

Dom Capers is the DC and Trgo is the D-line coach I believe. Not too bad with less responsibility and a demotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running a 3-4 isn't the answer for this team unless there was a major retooling. What people like about the 3-4 is the aggressive blitzing features. You can do that with a 4-3 as well just by adopting a Philly style attacking defense with more man under. That would utilize the same folks we have and provide the pressure and aggressive style we have lacked for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Running a 3-4 isn't the answer for this team unless there was a major retooling. What people like about the 3-4 is the aggressive blitzing features. You can do that with a 4-3 as well just by adopting a Philly style attacking defense with more man under. That would utilize the same folks we have and provide the pressure and aggressive style we have lacked for years.

I would definitely love to see us run a defense more in line with the Eagles.

Good point too, because we have similar strengths on defense that they do.

Still will need some DT help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
    • Nah it was Graham. I remember watching it live.
    • 2002 would have been Kasay. 
×
×
  • Create New...