Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Officials got that wrong


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

A fumble may be advanced by any player on either team regardless of whether recovered before or after ball hits the ground.

A fumble that goes forward and out of bounds will return to the fumbling team at the spot of the fumble unless the ball goes out of bounds in the opponent’s end zone. In this case, it is a touchback.

On a play from scrimmage, if an offensive player fumbles anywhere on the field during fourth down, only the fumbling player is permitted to recover and/or advance the ball. If any player fumbles after the two-minute warning in a half, only the fumbling player is permitted to recover and/or advance the ball. If recovered by any other offensive player, the ball is dead at the spot of the fumble unless it is recovered behind the spot of the fumble. In that case, the ball is dead at the spot of recovery. Any defensive player may recover and/or advance any fumble at any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which Panther was this rule made after? Can't remember.

It was before the Panthers even existed. It was the result of the play most remember as the "Immaculate Deception" game Raiders vs. Chargers. Raider TE Dave Casper caught a short pass and fumbled it forward for about 20 minutes, kicked it a few times and finally fell on it in the end zone for a TD... if I remember it correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was before the Panthers even existed. It was the result of the play most remember as the "Immaculate Deception" game Raiders vs. Chargers. Raider TE Dave Casper caught a short pass and fumbled it forward for about 20 minutes, kicked it a few times and finally fell on it in the end zone for a TD... if I remember it correctly.

also known as the Holy Roller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which Panther was this rule made after? Can't remember.

You might be thinkin about a game vs atlanta where one of carolinas guys either intercepted or recovered a fumble, his momentum carried him out of the back of the endzone and they gave atlanta a safety. They changed the rule the next offseason to where that wouldnt cause a safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was before the Panthers even existed. It was the result of the play most remember as the "Immaculate Deception" game Raiders vs. Chargers. Raider TE Dave Casper caught a short pass and fumbled it forward for about 20 minutes, kicked it a few times and finally fell on it in the end zone for a TD... if I remember it correctly.

Ken Stabler was getting tackled, "fumbled" forwards toward Casper, who pushed the ball a few times and then fell on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...