Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Luck doesn't come out, Fairley is our guy?


Gazi

Recommended Posts

I really hope not' date=' I think Fairley and Dareus are so overrated....this draft is so deep at DT especially with Juniors like Powe and Casey coming out early....[/quote']

That's why I'm thinking we might trade down and still be able to get him and have an extra high pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see how we would trade down. I dont think anybody would really want to trade up for the #1 in this draft. If Luck doesnt declare, I'd like Newton or Peterson. Damn, we really need Luck to declare because all the picks after Luck would really seem like a reach at #1. Luck doesnt declare, I'd really like to trade down a few and get Newton if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I know Fairley is definitely coming out, there's no doubt about that. He'd be a fine #1 if Luck/Newton don't come out.

No. Fairley would not improve this team, not one bit. He'd have as much impact on the team as Everette Brown.

We better not take anyone besides Luck, Green, or Peterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the defense has shown today, and other games they are very capable as an overall NFL defensive unit. However our offense is dead last and I would hate to see us take anything other than an offensive Player in the first round.

Even today our defense gave our Offense Great field position and multiple chances and we still had to repeatedly settle for field goals.

If no luck then I would want AJ Green. Seeing what Dez Bryant and Megatron can do for an offense makes me prefer Green if we can't get Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...